Formal Complaint -
On the night of December 14-15, 2025, I presented to Northern Nevada Medical Center's Emergency Department with severe abdominal pain persisting for two weeks (that had been meticulously tracked with a Medical Assistant Software my partner created, that was being used in real time during this visit). What followed was not the provision of medical care consistent with Nevada law or accepted standards of practice, but a sequence of dismissals, misrepresentations, and dangerous prescribing decisions that placed me, the patient, at risk and violated my rights.
From the moment of triage, critical information was distorted. A security guard misreported "back pain" instead of "abdominal pain," setting the stage for misdiagnosis. Nursing staff asked perfunctory questions without follow‑up, silenced my caregiver's attempts to provide medical history, and dismissed documented conditions including Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS). When my caregiver attempted to clarify, she was told she could, 'not speak for the patient', despite my autism and severe pain impairing my ability to recall details.
Physician Evensen DO, Erik Peter, demonstrated ignorance of MCAS, asking "what is that?" and then dismissing it as "rare." Despite repeated warnings, staff prescribed metronidazole (Flagyl)--a medication known to trigger mast cell reactions--alongside ciprofloxacin, creating unnecessary risk. Morphine was administered before a complete medical history was documented, violating basic safety protocols.
Laboratory results showed no infection: WBC 7.4, CRP not elevated, urinalysis clear. CT imaging confirmed diverticulosis without diverticulitis, no obstruction, no perforation. Yet antibiotics were prescribed "just in case," contradicting the findings. Meanwhile, the CT revealed hydronephrosis and a possible renal nodule--serious findings requiring urology follow‑up--which were not explained to me, the patient, or my caregiver with adequate clarity.
This complaint documents not isolated oversights but a pattern of systemic negligence: misdiagnosis, inappropriate prescribing, dismissal of caregiver advocacy, and obstruction of record access. These failures violated Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS 41A.015, NRS 449.720, NRS 629.515), federal EMTALA requirements, and the patient's fundamental right to safe, respectful care.
The harm is multifaceted: physical risk from contraindicated medication, emotional distress from repeated silencing, financial burden from unnecessary prescriptions, and systemic danger to every patient who presents with complex conditions. This complaint demands immediate accountability, retraining, and systemic reform. It is supported by timestamped documentation, medical records, and expert analysis.
This is not a request. This is notice. Substandard care will no longer be met with silence.
This ER will be receiving a formal 10 page complaint, full analytics ran, comparisons between the staff and my partner's Medical Assistant Software for minute-to-minute data on everything that was administered, said, done, and ignored. Hopefully no other patients go through this without knowing their full rights because this ER can, very literally, put your life in direct danger due to severe staff neglect
And if you made it this far and are wondering if it was busy, there was 1 other person in the ER when I showed up, so there's truly no excuse for this type of "care" read more