On 6/27/23 Dr. Aaron Smiley DVM, Chief of Staff @ Devonshire Veterinary Clinic Anderson, Indiana, as was proven by a circumstantially forced 2nd, exploratory surgery, done by Dr. Smiley and his attending/assisting surgical personnel/staff. Dr. Smiley, as per his own words/admittance, failed to "tie up", 2 tubes/stumps (right and left uterine stumps), during Ginger's simple spay surgery. it was because of Dr. Smiley's incompetence and careless negligence as her surgeon on this date that Ginger died from massive internal bleeding. the hypovolemia that led to hypovolemic shock caused unrecoverable and irreparable damage to Ginger's body systems and organ system. it is inconceivable as to how an experienced veterinarian surgeon was able to completely fail to tie up these 2 uterine tubes/ stumps that were left to bleed freely into Ginger's abdomen. further more why was Ginger's severe/critical condition, hemorrhaging allowed to go unchecked and unmonitored and lead into hypovolemia and hypovolemic shock. it is ultimately the responsibility of the surgeon to monitor her until her discharge. this was without question, not done by him or a warm blooded, medically trained clinician who would have been alerted early in her decline, to have been given interventions and administered treatments that would have saved her life. not only did I have to process the unexpected death of my beautiful and loving pet, I was forced to witness the unconscionable, unethical behaviors and actions of Dr. Aaron Smiley, his now Hospital Manager, and the now titled, 3 Veterinary Assistants , who actively and inactively, and in alliance with Dr. Smiley's directive in their attempt to "To get rid of a severely medically compromised animal. why? To divert focus and blame away from A. Smiley DVM, his staff and the clinic. They could and would have been able to claim her death was caused by her being transported and/or influences out of their control. they knew that they had to get rid of the only evidence, Ginger, that could, would, and did prove he was incompetent and Negligent. If it were not for Ginger's final collapse and had she not became unresponsive and unconscious, and if it were not for Ginger's 78 pounds, if she were a smaller dog , they would have succeeded in getting "rid" of the evidence. The telehealth monitoring or lack there-of in this case should be scrutinized and determined system was inappropriately used and implemented or withheld, and compromised a positive outcome for Ginger's survival. Thank You for reading my post read more