First, this response they posted is the same on they posted on facebook, prior to complaining about my review. Facebook took the review down. I got to say are you really that ashamed of yourselves?
"I am so sorry to hear about your experience at Cottage Jewelry. We are always trying to improve the quality of our customer's experience. I have spoken with the owner and reminded him to always ask at the beginning of a complimentary stone evaluation if the ring was purchase from us. Please note, your appointment was for a free evaluation, not a formal assessment."
First, the fact you have to remind Ira (why is Sarah posting from his account) to find out where a ring came from so he doesn't insult it... is saying a lot. Second, mean you don't even anywhere in this response address the fact he was insulting and condescending the entire time. Third, please note, that I was looking to sell the ring, it is not really a complimentary anything. It was you assessing if you wanted your own product back.
If you want to improve customer service, don't allow Ira to deal with customers.
"In these appointments, the owner estimates the stone's carat weight by looking at its measurements. (Mounted diamonds are harder to evaluate because the mounting can hide some of their characteristics, making the estimate less precise)."
As I said, "When I informed him I was told it was at least 1 carat he assured me I was wrong." Sorry saying it is estimate and assuring someone they are wrong two different factors. Also when you give a market value quot that is 500% lower than the actual market value... it isn't less precise it is wrong.
"For this reason, we always tell our customers to seek the opinion of two to three professional diamond buyers to get a solid idea of the specifications and state of their stone."
No you didn't. No one there did.
"Also, unlike gold, which has a quantifiable melt value, resale prices for diamonds have no one objective measure and we do the best we can to provide an estimate of the resale value."
Okay, so even if you weren't wrong, and a 500% difference isn't such a huge difference. And as for how you're dead wrong: 1) the price of gold fluctuates more than the diamonds,so the comparison is bad deflection 2) De Beers (and others) have done a very good job controlling the market prices. But again 500% difference is a major difference that cannot be explained by that. It is a weak deflection.
I can only assume you above information is because you assume people don't do market research, don't work in the trade, or have friends that work in the trade, or know how to use google, or follow the market.
"In a formal appraisal, we follow a detailed process to measure the stone's carat weight and verify other facts about the stone, in order to yield an accurate appraisal and assign a value to the ring."
You might, I don't know I can't comment on it. What I can comment on is what I said before Ira "assured me I was wrong" about the size of the stones.
"When customers would like to sell a ring purchased from us, we certainty take special consideration. We do ask that you provide a receipt for proof of purchase and bring this to our attention at the start of the appointment."
You didn't with me. Even after we told Ira about, he didn't ask for a receipt.
"Had you brought your receipt and brought to our attention that the ring was purchased from us seven years ago, we would've been able to better serve you and feel confident your experience would have been different."
Had you asked for the receipt I might have. Good job trying to blame a customer though.
"I would like to invite you back in for a complimentary piece of jewelry from our silver case. Please let me know when you plan to visit us again. "
Sure buy your ring back at market price, I will even through in the appraisal papers for you guys. read more