Well, after telling the wife that we should see this years bigger and better performance, we both came away really disappointed. Sure, there's gay SEX and a great trampoline act (and the bungee act was amazing too), but really, it felt like a weak, hobbling watered down version of Cirque du Soleil, with no soul. Was this the same troupe that performed last year with so much panache and heartfelt emotion? Maybe it was the smaller tent, smaller budget, more intimate and connected setting.
I checked out the director, Joshua Ryan Zehner and assistant director Jason Berrent, both Cirque du Soleil alums, who have real talent in creating characters. However, directors they are not. Not even close. Stick to clowning, Gentlemen, your talent is most certainly not in developing a storyline or of directing along the lines of a Tim Burton movie. Batman, Sweeney Todd, Beetlejuice were all campy and dark, following the Burton trend -- but there was a story. Here, after reading the initial reviews, I was expecting a Tim Burton-ish Orpeheus storyline woven tightly into the theme of a dark, sinister circus.
What I got was the cheap scare of a one-track sideshow funhouse that was the SAME AS LAST YEARS SHOW??? I mean, come on, just because the cast was dressed in funky dark costumes, somehow it was "dark" and sinister? What the hell did Zehner/Berrent actually do? I don't get it. You paid thousands of dollars to put on this show, and your audience gets what? The same show, a bigger tent, higher prices and a few choice acts???
The show came across as disjointed (see the above reason), lacking any focus, and it didn't even seem as if the cast was having any fun. Painted on smiles don't count. At least in a Cirque show you got a succession of fantastic acts woven together with a barely there storyline (except for Kooza, which is a major diversion from the normal "dark" cirque shows, albeit about clowns and the amazing stories which connect them .. - it's this level of class which makes it all the more inexplicable why Berrent and Zehner couldn't figure out at least the basics of what to do with the material present in Beneath -- since they were both cast members in the more famous cirque-- which incidentally (or coincindentally opens on Oct. 16 2009 in Santa Monica -- how nice)), in the Berzerk tent you had some fantastic acts, and several extremely mediocre ones and the dancing, frankly, sucked. So, the show starts out telling a story, drops the story, and at the end, somehow the girl in red picks up again to do some kind of ring performance... well, whatever.. there's no story and then people come on stage with fire.. and that's the ending. Whatever. Two thumbs sideways.
The trampoline act was amazing, and the hand balancing act were top notch, but that alone wasn't worth the money. In the end, it was fun and entertaining being out in the middle of the last open space in Los Angeles with the wife, but would I spend $160 dollars to see it again, hardly. Wait for the Kooza show on Oct 16th where you will see quality of the type from the sailor/acrobat, trampoline act throughout the entire show. Also, did anyone else notice how loud and completely off the music was?
And as the previous Yelper pointed out, the show does NOT play to the full 300 degrees of the stage, so if you're trying to save a few bucks and go see a show for $25, it's not even worth it as you won't see anything except when the stage rotates. My wife tells me I am being too hard on the artists and that I should be supporting the arts, but if I'm supporting amateurs, then the pricing should be in line with the level of talent, right? read more