Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Charles H. McClenaghan

    4.0 (4 reviews)
    Open 8:30 am - 2:00 pm

    Services - Charles H. McClenaghan

    Business litigation

    Real estate law

    Trust planning

    Charles H. McClenaghan Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Charles H. McClenaghan

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    3 years ago

    Great customer service from all of the staff.I highly recommend these lawyers.

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    9 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 1
    Love this 1
    Oh no 1

    9 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Charles H. McClenaghan

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Real Estate Law 116 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Jarvis Law Office, PC

    Jarvis Law Office, PC

    (2 reviews)

    They advertise a free 90 minute "consultation" but what they actually provide is a 90 minute note…read moretaking session with a "client navigator". This person has you rehash everything you've outlined twice previously for the firm: once during an initial 15 min call outlining your situation with a different non-lawyer and again via an extensive online questionnaire providing facts & details of your situation. We walked into the "consultation" expecting that an attorney had reviewed our paperwork previous to the appointment and the "client navigator" would share the broad stroke strategy the attorney had conceived. What we got was that neither Cayce nor an attorney had read anything I had provided previously. It was literally, "So tell me about your situation." Huh? A consultation is defined as a conference at which advice is given or views are exchanged; a meeting to discuss the treatment of a case. How can that be achieved when one party hasn't even read about the case at hand? For a law firm to be inaccurate with it's language is enormous cause for concern. Additionally, Cayce was late to the 9:00am appointment. My father opened the office door for her yet when she came into the meeting room, she lied about her delay saying she was conferring with an attorney. I guess it's true, you get what you pay for. Zero value in this offering. Save yourself some time and go to an attorney that won't bury you in "their procedure" and actually give you some insights that will help you determine if they can help your case or not.

    Mary Panepucci and Brenon Russell are incredible assets to Jarvis Law Offices. They administer…read moreadvice and take care of challenging legal situations with grace and integrity. They have been invaluable and compassionate during a very difficult transition for our elderly loved ones. I would (and have) highly recommend them to anyone looking for top-notch elder law services. Words fail to express how integral they have been to our peace of mind in the last year. Thank you for outstanding service!

    Doucet

    Doucet

    (5 reviews)

    I am very dissatisfied with your firm's handling of my case…read more 1. Initially, we discussed the primary issue I wanted the Judge to be aware of: the arbitrator failed to consider the VOID document, in which MI and I agreed that all silicone in the bathrooms would be redone before purchasing the home. This task was never completed, leading to the initial lawsuit. MI made an agreement and signed it merely to close the deal, then reneged on it. Subsequently, the initial lawyer, in the first case, requested a third-party inspection to avoid a "my word vs. MI" scenario. However, all discussions, as reflected in the New Judge's decision remarks, only addressed the quality of work, without mentioning the violation of a contractual obligation. 2. Your firm has had three different attorneys on this case. Initially, communication was consistent. After months of accepting my payments, your firm failed to address the prolonged duration of the case, with no follow-ups with the courts- UNTIL I called in early January to inquire about the status. At that point, you filed to determine where the case stands. When the courts provided a timeline, which was missed, your newest member handling my case, Rachel, filed a new document. Please see the email below detailing her negligence and unprofessional decision. I trusted your law firm, only to have a lawyer later tell me, "Yeah, wasn't effective to submit that." ...After giving it another two weeks, your firm did nothing but sit on my account and receive my money. I called the courts and was informed there was a glitch and they are backdated. Had your attorney(s) approached my case with passion and understanding, considering it has been ongoing for three years with over $40K spent, I would have fewer complaints about my experience with your firm and this loss. Currently, I am seeking another firm to handle my case. You are the second firm that has listened to me, agreed with me in the beginning-and then failed to include the information I requested in the narrative presented to the judge or listening officials. This portrayal presented to the judge focused solely on our "dissatisfaction with the quality of work", rather than highlighting the fact that MI rushed to sign a punch list with agreed corrections to be made, then refused to complete these corrections. After two attempts with inattentive lawyers and their legal jargon, the point was missed yet again, leaving me in a worse position than when I started.

    Recently I've had the opportunity to learn more about the Ohio Servicemember Civil Relief Act…read more(SCRA). Troy Doucet made himself very available to answer questions that I had and to clarify some key points that are not very well defined in the Ohio SCRA. I would recommend to any military personnel from Ohio to contact him and potentially his firms services. Additionally, for all other inquiries I recommend the same. He is polite and does a great job of explaining law in Layman's Terms. 6-Stars out of 5 from me.

    Charles H. McClenaghan - realestatelawyers - Updated May 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...