I lived here for about 2 years before moving to a doorman building on 81st street. There are definite pros/cons about this building.
Pros - Up and coming area for what used to be a very dangerous place to live in the early 90's. Now, there is a fair amount of night life and easy access to public transportation, although not too close to the express trains. The building has nice amenities such as a rooftop with barbecue grills and a private garden (when not under renovation, as below). The front desk staff are receptive and friendly.
Cons - 94th street can be desolate at night, since many of the long-standing businesses downstairs have recently gone out of business and are shuttered. The area isn't the greatest, and is only 1 subway stop (about 6 blocks) away from the more dangerous East Harlem. Also, this building has been undergoing MAJOR renovations for the past year. I have several small children at home, and the building frequently turns of the entire building's water supply so that my children had to bathe in bottled water. When the water is restored after a day-long shortage, it ends up being brown and having sediments for 24+ hours. Luxury NYC high-rise building or quasi-developing world nation? This past winter, the building's gas pipes burst, and residents were without ovens for 15 days. Along these lines, the building's laundry room burst into flames last year and caused a major fire in the stairwells and on the entire 1st floor. I was at work when this happened, and my nanny had to rush my children down 17 flights of stairs and ended up inhaling large amounts of smoke in the 1st floor stairwell. Further, I paid Manhattan-type rents for the entire past year, yet the building's gym, pool, and lobby were under renovation. Not exactly an NYC-type all-amenity building if you ask me. Finally, I have heard of several thefts from apartments on the lower floor of the building.
In summary, this is a relatively nice building, although it's outdated (built in 1987) and clearly shows. The water outages are unacceptable and the building's gas pipes need to be checked/fixed. When charging such rents, it's not fair to remove the building's gym and pool. For a little higher price, consider looking into higher quality buildings in the UES - Gotham, Monterey, Park Avenue Court, Lucida, Colorado.
An addendum to the review above -
1) The rooftop has been closed to renovations since early August. How dare they close the rooftop and bbq grills in the summer months and just in time for labor day weekend?! That brings the building's functional amenities to 0/3 (rooftop NEGATIVE, gym NEGATIVE, pool NEGATIVE). DO NOT pay $4,300 for a 1-bedroom in a building without any amenities. This is what our friends in the building were asked to pay for a 10-month lease....an 8 percent rent increase from 2013-2014.
2) Scaffolding galore surrounding the building's facade, presumably for years to come. Likely a scare tactic to remove the remaining residents.
3) The only tenant in the building that was allowed to stay (Yorkville Endoscopy at 201 east 93rd Street) is going through its own set of major media problems (c/o ABC News). Google this business. THIS BUILDING IS CURSED. DO NOT move here.
4) The red herring booklet offered our friends on the 30th floor a grand discounted price of $950,000 for a 1-bedroom. This unit will hit the market at $1M+ per the conversion book. Market price for a building within a stone's throw of Harlem and with outdated gas pipes and plumbing? Probably not....
5) The Manhattan US Attorney is looking to sue this building for not being ADA-compliant (rooftop has steep steps and no wheelchair access....kitchens are very narrow and unable to accommodate wheelchairs) just like the sister building at One Carnegie Hill was recently sued. (Story - http://www.wnyc.org/story/us-attorney-alleges-developer-discrimination/) read more