There is a huge distinction between drivable versus safe. We recently went to the CarMax in Kearny Mesa San Diego to purchase a 2022 Mini Cooper Countryman. Specs looked good & checked out on paper, and so we took it out for a test drive. We were told by three different reps (Marcello, Noel & Daniel) that the vehicle being sold to us was deemed safe due to their "CarMax standards & 125-point multi inspection". As any reasonable & responsible person would do, we opted to take the vehicle to our own service technician - Mack with Sd Mini Garage - a certified Mini specialist to perform a post-purchase inspection. Unfortunately, he found several issues - three of which involve major safety concerns - a broken engine mount, a cracked hydraulic mount, and all 4 tires showing dry rot (with one tire having a nail/staple lodged right into the tread). We presented the full inspection report & recommendations to the car service rep Noel. After their review, we were ultimately told the only thing they would replace was the broken engine mount - they rejected ALL of the other recommendations from our inspection - including the cracked hydraulic mount & tires. We were told the "tires are good, tread is fine, minor cracks here & there are just cosmetic. As for the nail/staple, we'll have our tech check to see if we can just remove it and do a patch job." They immediately referred to their "CarMax standards & 125-point multi inspection" (again), giving us a rundown why they can't & won't replace the tires, nor take care of all the other recommendations. Because of that, we were willing to compromise and not pursue the other issues that our tech found - just the major ones involving safety. I kindly asked if we can get a written guarantee that the tires are indeed safe, since their technicians deemed it to be SAFE. They said no, they can't. I then asked would you risk the safety of you or your family by getting in the car and driving it, knowing full well that the integrity of the tires are potentially compromised? Noel again said no, he wouldn't. So why on earth then would you refuse to correct that safety concern, and continue trying to sell us or anyone else this car? I believe that these concerns were reasonable and valid, and fixing them was very attainable. Noel instead offered for us to buy a whole set of new tires at their cost - yes, that was the alternative. We politely declined, and it was then we decided we no longer want the car and will return it. He directed us to Daniel the sales manager to begin the process for the return. He of course asked us why we were returning the car, and after explaining to him the entire situation, he again recited the whole "CarMax standards & 125-point multi inspection" spiel back to us (if anything, they are at least consistent). Daniel had also boasted that he himself was a tire expert because of his time working at a WalMart tire center, claiming he can instantly tell if the tire needs replacing just by looking at it, as well as pinpoint with exactness how old the tire is. Maybe this will be the one guy who can FINALLY work with the paying customer. The car was parked just outside his office and so the "tire expert" offered to take a look, accompanied by Noel. He literally comes back in 30 seconds and says "I can't overrule what the technicians over here say because I'm in Sales" - that's it, that's all he said. It's unfortunate, they lost business, lost credibility, and of course lost any hope of us ever returning there. We are now out $765 ($149 shipping and $616 for the PPI) for a car they never should have sold. Again - drivable does NOT mean SAFE. Know when to walk away. read more