Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Carden Dotzler Hammond

    5.0 (1 review)
    Closed 8:30 am - 5:30 pm

    Services - Carden Dotzler Hammond

    Criminal defense

    Divorce law

    Carden Dotzler Hammond Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Carden Dotzler Hammond

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    9 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Carden Dotzler Hammond

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Criminal Defense Law 144 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Frank H Hiscock Legal Aid Society

    Frank H Hiscock Legal Aid Society

    1.0
    (5 reviews)

    I started a divorce. Had 3 meetings signed all the paperwork and was told I would hear back. This…read morewas four months ago. They now do not respond to phone messages or emails. Zero stars

    Terrible terrible! I wanted to give zero star. Anyway, they are terrible because the Hiscock…read moreLegal Aid Society was not nice. RUDE is the personality they need to be disciplined by the NYS BAR Association. Here is why.. I am divorcing but the online divorce is taking forever that it should be 30 days. It has been 90 days. Filed by my estranged wife, and so I was going to go down to Hiscock but I thought I call first. I did on Monday, 26 July 2022. And they said I need to take the Intake and remind you this. I am DEAF and I had the recording instead and said to leave name and number. Oh they cant do that because I am Deaf. Duh! So, I did not get the call and I called them just now. This is the exact copy and paste from the relay service! Ha! Perfect legal proof to stay away from this legal aid society and they need to be disbarred! Stay away, folks! Go to another attorney and try to get a lawyer go Pro Bono. Am currently looking for a lawyer who can Pro Bono. Here is the transcript. (315) 422-8191 T-MOBILE IP RELAY (Redacted) Me (OPERATOR: DOES NOT MATTER WHAT GENDER OPR IS). Live person please. (315) 422-8191 DIALING 315-422-8191 (HISCOCKLY SOCIETY) (RECORDING PLAYING) (PRESSED 0 for STAFF MEMBER() RINGING 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... (F) OK ONE MOMENT please (MUSIC PLAYING) (HOLDING . . . ,. , I APOLGIZE FOR THE HOLD HOW CAN I HELP YOU Q GA Me I am Mark (Redacted) and I called before and I had to be taken to the intake and it was just recording and I left my name and number but because I am Deaf, cannot hear the phone to talk. Is it ok I can come in to write out or fill in the intake form and then talk with a lawyer about my divorce processing problems? ga (315) 422-8191 (PERSON HUNG UP) SR 7703F GA OR SK Me wow. I am going to file with the state BAR. thank you! ga to sk (315) 422-8191 YOUR CALL HAS BEEN DISCONNECTED AT Tue Jul 26 2022 13:02:00 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time). THANK YOU FOR USING IP RELAY. TOTAL CONVERSATION TIME: 00:03:38

    Scott Micho, Esq

    Scott Micho, Esq

    1.6
    (5 reviews)

    This attorney is suspended for Malpractice- (script from…read more https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-fourth-department/2019/2019-ny-slip-op-00806.html We find respondent guilty of professional misconduct and conclude that he has violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0): rule 1.3 (a)--failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; rule 1.3 (b)--neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him; rule 1.5 (d) (5) (ii)--entering into an arrangement for, charging or collecting a fee in a domestic relations matter without a written retainer agreement signed by respondent and the client setting forth in plain language the nature of the relationship and the details of the fee arrangement; rule 8.4 (b)--engaging in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer; rule 8.4 (c)--engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; rule 8.4 (d)--engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and rule 8.4 (h)--engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. We also conclude that respondent has violated 22 NYCRR 1400.3 by failing to execute a written retainer agreement in a domestic relations matter that provides for, inter alia, itemized billing statements to be sent to the client at least every 60 days. In determining an appropriate sanction, we have considered respondent's submissions in mitigation, including his statement that he has reduced his case load and has hired a legal secretary to assist with law office scheduling, billing, and communications with clients. We have also considered, however, certain factors in aggravation of the misconduct, including that charge one arises from a lengthy course of conduct intended to deceive a tribunal and that charge two concerns respondent's severe neglect of a client matter that resulted in substantial harm to the client. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until further order of the Court.

    Terrible!!!! All he had to do was get me child support arrears and he couldn't even do that. He had…read moreno idea what he was doing !! Oh by the way it took him seven years To get to the court house . He kept rescheduling my case like I didn't need the support money. And give him copies of your paperwork !!!! Never an original. You will never get them back regardless of the hundreds of times that you beg them back from him! He should have been Barred!!!!! This attorney is suspended for Malpractice- (script from https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-fourth-department/2019/2019-ny-slip-op-00806.html We find respondent guilty of professional misconduct and conclude that he has violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0): rule 1.3 (a)--failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; rule 1.3 (b)--neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him; rule 1.5 (d) (5) (ii)--entering into an arrangement for, charging or collecting a fee in a domestic relations matter without a written retainer agreement signed by respondent and the client setting forth in plain language the nature of the relationship and the details of the fee arrangement; rule 8.4 (b)--engaging in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer; rule 8.4 (c)--engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; rule 8.4 (d)--engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and rule 8.4 (h)--engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. We also conclude that respondent has violated 22 NYCRR 1400.3 by failing to execute a written retainer agreement in a domestic relations matter that provides for, inter alia, itemized billing statements to be sent to the client at least every 60 days. In determining an appropriate sanction, we have considered respondent's submissions in mitigation, including his statement that he has reduced his case load and has hired a legal secretary to assist with law office scheduling, billing, and communications with clients. We have also considered, however, certain factors in aggravation of the misconduct, including that charge one arises from a lengthy course of conduct intended to deceive a tribunal and that charge two concerns respondent's severe neglect of a client matter that resulted in substantial harm to the client. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until further order of the Court. Read less

    Carden Dotzler Hammond - criminaldefense - Updated August 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...