Outstanding Living Trust Attorney…read more James did an absolutely amazing job handling our living trust. From start to finish, he was professional, knowledgeable, and incredibly thorough. He took the time to explain everything clearly, answered all of our questions with patience, and made what could have been an overwhelming process feel simple and stress-free. His attention to detail and genuine care for his clients truly set him apart. We felt confident and well-supported every step of the way. If you're looking for a trustworthy, efficient, and highly skilled living trust lawyer, I cannot recommend The Lawyer in Blue Jeans Group enough. Thank you James! P.S. his Padres bobblehead Doll collection is pretty cool too!

When in probate go to a probate specialist because the guys in jeans will take 90% of what you got…read more(or had) and won't tell you what's best for you and your family but what's best for those blue jeans pockets

Karen Fiumara was my lawyer during my divorce and I would have say, she needs to understand more…read moreabout the situation you are in. Please do your research before using a lawyer for divorce. It seemed conversations would go well on the phone and then nothing would be resolved. Unfortunately, my ex was one of the cheapest men out there, so I don't blame her for that. I'm just here to say, she needs to fight harder and do more research and get a back bone. If you are looking to get someone to help you and be strong during the hardest fight... don't go with her.

My experience with Kyle was deeply disappointing and ultimately damaging…read more I retained Kyle from late 2017 through mid-2023 for a complex, high-conflict custody and child support matter. During this period, I was unemployed, facing a federal civil lawsuit by the FTC, and under an asset freeze. Despite repeated requests--documented in emails over multiple years--for Kyle to correct my temporary child support obligations using proper guideline calculations (which would have shown the mother owing me support), he failed to act. On his advice, I stipulated in early 2018 to pay $3,000/month "without prejudice," under the belief that we would later correct the figures retroactively. However, when the FTC filed suit and froze my assets in late 2018, Kyle refused to address support at our November 2018 hearing. He advised against pursuing the issue, despite my financial hardship and the mother's continued employment and higher income. His October 16, 2018 response to my concerns was: "I'd like to avoid all that at this point, if at all possible, as the cost is going to outweigh the benefit." In hindsight, this decision has been devastating. That temporary order--never corrected--ultimately led to an erroneous $109,000 arrears judgment based on numbers the mother submitted to DCSS on her FL-420 and FL-421 forms. These inflated figures were taken at face value, and I am still fighting to unwind them in court. DCSS now confirms the mother, who earns four times my income, should be paying me support. Yet I cannot receive it because of these "arrears" she is being reimbursed for--based on flawed, outdated data Kyle never challenged. I'm now forced to pursue a motion to vacate this judgment on my own, because Kyle refuses to assist in fixing this monumental error. In addition, I asked Kyle for years to seek a restraining order due to repeated abusive conduct by the mother toward me and the children. He declined to pursue it. After relieving him, I filed for a TRO on my own and was granted one that lasted 7 months--proving that my concerns were valid and should have been raised long before. I eventually decided to allow the DVRO to expire because the mother stipulated to quit acting in a list of abusive ways to the children and I. This review is hard to write, as I once viewed Kyle as a trusted advisor and even a friend. But I spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on his services, and in the end, I was left unprotected and saddled with legal and financial burdens that could have been avoided. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend his representation. He is also ignoring me.

I am beyond pleased with my experience as Atty. Eric Schneider was my representative for my case…read moretoday for the extention of the DVRO. I highly recommend Eric Schneider, he is smart, knowledgable, thorough and attentive throughout the process. Having a lawyer who pays close attention to detail can make a significant difference. That's really important, especially when safety is a concern. Eric made sure everything where the law is concerned is followed and carried out. He continues to be a great resource when I have questions and responds quickly. I would highly recommend Eric Scnheider. I am beyond pleased with my experience. Thank you Eric Schneider for your assistance.

I have an ongoing case, and my attorney Eric S. Schneider and his team has been there for me every…read morestep of the way. I first met with Eric through a free consultation, and felt that he was very thorough, knowledgeable, and no BS. I still wanted to have more options and called different law offices. I was very hesitant as I have never worked with an attorney before and heard many horror stories of law offices being in it for the money. I did not get that feeling with Eric. What I felt was that every penny spend was worth it. Eric and his team helped me get through one of the most difficult parts of my life. Everything from the communications to the billing has been nothing but thorough and professional. My only concern is that, should I ever need to work with another attorney on a completely unrelated matter, my expectations may now be impossibly high.

I worked with Steve on my divorce back in 2006…read more If you are looking for the cheapest lawyer, he is not your guy. My divorce ended up costing around $50k and it was well worth it. He crushed my ex wife's lawyer so badly that she removed herself from the case and my ex ended up representing herself. He is a bulldog and will inflict pain if the other side tries to get cute. If you have a simple case with no bad feelings involved, don't use him. But if you have a long drawn out bloodbath, he will go to battle for you. I had a lot to lose, and thanks to Steve I didn't.

Avoid at all cost!! Drove 35 mins away for a consultation at 3 pm, which I even spoke to Mr. Bishop…read moreyesterday and later confirmed my 3pm arrival for today. I was greeted by the receptionist with a smack on the clip board while telling me to fill out a 10-page intake (again, my appointment was an initial consultation). However, after waiting for 25 minutes, during which time no one said anything regarding the delay, I decided to leave. Due to their lack of customer service and professionalism, I will seek representation elsewhere!

This is the best legal team in California! They always know…read morewhat buttons to press to get the best results! Not only am I a client, I refer all my clients to Hoffman and Forde knowing they will take care of my clients and get the very best results! Thank you Schuler and Dan!

Working with Hoffman & Forde -- specifically Mike Dicks -- was one of the most frustrating…read moreprofessional experiences I've ever had. My sister and I hired the firm to represent us in a construction defect case involving our home. At first, our case was assigned to a junior attorney. When that attorney left the firm, Mike Dicks took over. From that point on, the entire process became far more stressful and chaotic than it needed to be. Instead of feeling like our attorney was advocating for us, it constantly felt like we were being pressured, dismissed, or talked down to. Any time we asked questions or pushed back on changes, we were treated as if we were the problem. One of the most maddening patterns was being told that parts of the settlement agreement were "final." We were repeatedly told we could not make further changes. Then the defense would make additional changes anyway, and suddenly those changes were allowed. When we asked questions about those changes, we were told we were jeopardizing the deal. This happened over and over again and created constant confusion about what was actually finalized and what wasn't. Another major issue was the lack of attention to detail. We provided extensive documentation of the problems with our house, including photos and written descriptions. Despite that, several critical issues were not properly addressed in the settlement scope. My sister repeatedly had to review and redline documents herself just to correct errors or omissions that should have been caught by our attorney. A perfect example involves two large floor-to-ceiling windows. Multiple experts who walked through the house suspected those windows were leaking, but we did not yet have clear documentation of water intrusion. Then, right around the time we were being pushed to sign earlier versions of the settlement agreement, a storm came through. During that storm my sister was able to record water visibly running down the inside of one of the windows. Despite that evidence, those windows were still not included in the final settlement scope, even though they were clearly part of the water intrusion issues affecting the property. The office also seemed extremely disorganized. We were asked multiple times for documents we had already provided. Outdated versions of the settlement agreement were circulated and referred to as the final version. At times it genuinely felt like no one was carefully reviewing the documents being sent to us. We were also repeatedly told the defendants were essentially insolvent and that we needed to accept the settlement because there was no money to pursue. When we asked how that determination had been made, the only documentation referenced was a financial disclosure sheet completed by the defendant himself listing limited assets. We were never informed if the actual business's financial records had been reviewed. Throughout all of this, the firm's partner, Daniel Forde, was copied on many of the communications but never stepped in to address the obvious problems. To be clear, the construction work that is now being completed at the property has addressed many of the defects. In fact, the damage turned out to be so extensive that the contractors ultimately ended up doing far more work than what was originally contemplated in the settlement. But that outcome came despite the legal representation, not because of it. What should have been professional legal guidance instead turned into months of unnecessary stress, confusion, and frustration. Far too often it felt like we were the ones doing the detailed review work while also paying legal fees. If you are considering hiring Hoffman & Forde, I strongly recommend asking very direct questions about who will actually handle your case and how closely documents will be reviewed before anything is finalized. Our experience with Mike Dicks was chaotic, exhausting, and deeply disappointing.

Mickey Jew, one of the best lawyers you could ever have on your side. Passionate, responsive,…read morecaring, and truly one of a kind. He goes above and beyond for his clients. You'll be very lucky to have him representing you. Highly recommend!

I recently met with Mr. Holben for a free session via the SD Bar Association's…read more He was welcoming, generous with his time and his advice was reasonable, straight forward and cost saving. I'll go back to him with any future legal needs.

If you are looking for an amazing law firm who genuinely wants to help you - look no further!…read more Will is such an amazing individual. He took my phone call after hours and thoughtfully reviewed my case in detail. He provided excellent feedback which really put me at ease. His calm demeanor, genuine care and can-do attitude was a much needed breath of fresh air. I have found my law firm for life and will be sure to recommend Will and the Team! Thanks again, Will!

Turnbow is responsive, professional, and experienced. We have a variety of legal needs, from…read moreemployment contracts to establishing an LLC. The FBI also contacted us as part of an investigation into a third party, and we were grateful to have Turnbow establish their authenticity and run interference. We are enjoying working with Turnbow.

Vincent Casiano of the Casiano Law Firm represented the opposing party in a trust matter that has…read morebeen pending for more than three years. During that time, communications from the litigant and the litigant's legal representatives were frequently ignored. Requests for updates, documentation, and basic information often required repeated follow-ups before any response was received. Between January 14 and March 13, 2026, there were more than 14 documented requests for updates, accounting, and disbursement of funds. Mr. Casiano stated multiple times that he would provide figures and supporting documentation, but those materials were never delivered. Several messages during this period received no response at all. Public records from the California State Bar show that Mr. Casiano has previously been disciplined for failing to respond to clients and for failing to account for client funds upon request. The ongoing lack of responsiveness in this matter raises serious concerns regarding compliance with professional and fiduciary obligations. Settlement funds also appear to be held without clear explanation or necessity. Attorneys holding third-party funds are required to account for them and promptly distribute undisputed amounts. The repeated failure to do so in this case caused unnecessary delay. Key Points 3+ years of limited responsiveness 14+ documented requests between Jan 14-Mar 13, 2026 Prior California State Bar discipline for similar conduct Promised accounting and disbursement never provided This review reflects the litigant's personal experience in this matter.

Public Review: Vincent M. Casiano…read more Vincent Casiano of the Casiano Law Firm represented the opposing party in a trust matter that has been pending for more than three years. During that time, communications from both myself and my legal representatives were frequently ignored. Requests for updates, documentation, and basic information often required repeated follow-ups to receive any response. Between January 14 and March 13, 2026, there were more than 14 documented requests for updates, accounting, and disbursement of funds. Mr. Casiano stated multiple times that he would provide figures and supporting documentation, but those materials were never delivered. Several messages during this period received no response at all. Public records from the California State Bar show that Mr. Casiano has previously been disciplined for failing to respond to clients and for failing to account for client funds upon request. The ongoing lack of responsiveness in this matter raises serious concerns regarding compliance with professional and fiduciary obligations. Settlement funds also appear to be held without clear explanation or necessity. Attorneys holding third-party funds are required to account for them and promptly distribute undisputed amounts. The repeated failure to do so in this case caused unnecessary delay. Key Points 3+ years of limited responsiveness 14+ documented requests between Jan 14-Mar 13, 2026 Prior California State Bar discipline for similar conduct Promised accounting and disbursement never provided This review reflects my personal experience in this matter.