Bill Leighton has provided me with some quality legal help. He's a pleasant and down to earth guy…read more He's not eager to take all of your money either. He can get to the point, give some good advice, and help you get on with it.

Got in a Lyft car accident and this lawfirm took care of everything. My settlement exceeded my…read moreexpectations and they were always available to get a hold of for anything.

This is the best law firm around they went out of there way to make sure I got the best settlement…read morepossible David Annette and Sam are great at there job and they went out of there way to make sure I was taken care of if your in an accident look no further then this Rocking law firm they mean business and they take care of business 100%

couldn't have asked for a better lawyer. He got my case dismissed and made the whole process much…read moreless stressful. He was concise, direct, and patient, which I especially appreciated as someone with anxiety/PTSD. I highly recommend him to anyone who needs not only a skilled attorney but also someone who makes you feel supported.

This is an old review but I'll go ahead and drop it here. I was looking to bring on co counsel for…read morea family matter. At another attorney's recommendation I consulted Mr. Lusk. When I walked into his office, I was slightly concerned. The impression of the office itself wasn't the best, I was greeted by a lady in flip flops, I was asked to move my car (no signage in gravel parking lot) and there's a paper sign hanging on the front desk that says "no phones" I was charged the consulting fee in advance of our meeting, which is just kind of bad optics imho. I waited 38 minutes beyond the meeting time for our consult. At that point I should have been paid for my time sitting in a lobby with no ac which left me forced to sit in 5:00 traffic after conclusion of the late consult. I stuck it out because 1. I believe in the attorney making the rec and 2. I paid in advance of my wait. When I sat down with Mr Lusk he was kind and asked questions initially. Very early on he seemed to know enough to not need to ask any questions and on a couple occasions seemed argumentative about minor, irrelevant things that were simple fact. He admits to being pretty aggressive which I'm sure works great in certain instances. He quoted me a retainer 3x others with higher billable rates. At 50 minutes into our meeting, he sort of accusingly said "I've got another appointment sitting there for 40 minutes waiting on me" which I politely pointed out was due to my appointment being delayed ~40 minutes (rather than me taking an excessive amount of time or time beyond the hour consult I scheduled and paid for.) I bet Mr Lusk is a great attorney, just was definitely not the right fit for me.

Johnny is a class act and represented me in a child custody case that he handled with…read moreprofessionalism, diligence and grace. He kept me informed every step of the way, answered every one of my questions, even if I asked them more than once, he made sure I was well prepared for court and he always ALWAYS answered the phone or called me back. We walked away with the case going in our favor. Johnny made sure every detail I asked for was addressed in our orders. I would recommend him with the highest confidence.

I meet Johnny several years ago thru a mutual friend and I had him represent me in a divorce that I…read morewas engaged in... Johnny took my case on short notice, he got to work immediately and was extremely prepared on my court date. Johnny kept me updated on any and all the things going on with my case.... To make a long story short, Mr. Urrutia destroyed my ex's case.... As I was granted custody of my 3 children, the house, all of its contents and child support!!! I will continue to retain Johnny Urrutia for any of my future legal needs.

I hired the Thomas Law Firm to review a few business contracts for an upcoming event. The work was…read moredone quickly and professionally. After this good experience, I decided to use them again in a tenant-landlord dispute and the issue was resolved efficiently and with great communication. Will definitely use again in the future if any additional needs arise. Their office is located in the Bee Cave Galleria.

DO NOT TRUST THIS ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT YOU…read more I hired Griffith "Hunter" Thomas II in 2021, trusting him as the managing attorney and namesake of Thomas Law Firm. I paid a $5,000 retainer in good faith and was left with a stalled case, procedural failures, and no resolution after more than three years. I am now in the process of filing formal complaints with both the State Bar of Texas and the Better Business Bureau. 1. Repeated Failure to Serve Opposing Counsel. Despite multiple assurances that key motions had been filed -- including one to dismiss the case and another to recover my $6,200 bond -- they were never served on the opposing party, rendering them procedurally useless. "Our firm was not served with the motion to request the return of cash deposit nor with appellant's motion to withdraw appeal... The motions were not 'unopposed' but were simply unreceived by us." -- Opposing counsel, April 2025 This wasn't an isolated mistake. I have similar evidence from 2022 confirming the same issue. This shows a pattern of negligence, not just a one-time oversight. 2. Contradictory Claims About Firm Identity and Evasion of Responsibility. In 2025, Mr. Thomas attempted to distance himself from responsibility by claiming that a "previous firm" had represented me -- despite the fact that the firm still operates under his name, from the same location, using the same phone number and email address that have been active since 2021. He wrote: "As you both should know, my previous firm represented you in the subject-titled cause. I was listed as an attorney on the case, though I should not have been. I did provide minimal advice to your lead attorney on a certain question, and I was the managing attorney of that firm at the time. Since then, our new firm wanted to help finalize the case, however, and though I would like to help y'all, I must withdraw due to a conflict of interest." -- Griffith "Hunter" Thomas II, 2025 No formal substitution of counsel or withdrawal was ever filed. The attempt to rebrand or relabel the same legal entity appears to be a blatant misrepresentation, designed to sidestep professional responsibility without changing any actual operations. 3. $5,000 Retainer Depleted Without Results. Despite repeated commitments to advance the case, no hearing was set and no motion was ever ruled on. Instead, my entire retainer was depleted -- not on progress, but on: * Internal file reviews by junior attorneys * Repeated responses to my update requests * Reworking tasks that should've been completed long ago At no point did my case move meaningfully forward. Their inaction left me right where I started -- only with thousands of dollars gone. 4. Poor Supervision of Inexperienced Staff. My case was eventually handed off to a first-year associate who had recently joined the firm. He appeared at a key hearing (a Temporary Restraining Order) and said nothing. He was left to manage filings and deadlines with little to no oversight -- resulting in additional errors and delays that undermined my position. I was ultimately forced to represent myself. After years of missed deadlines, broken promises, and misleading communication, I was told I would need to pay even more to continue -- despite the fact that my original $5,000 retainer should have been more than sufficient for this matter. At that point, I had no choice but to represent myself. Mr. Thomas's actions violated my trust and appear to violate multiple provisions of the Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Avoid this attorney. Don't be fooled by polished branding, vague excuses, or shifting stories. What I experienced was negligence, misrepresentation, and costly deflection -- while my case stalled and my retainer disappeared.

Mr. Urrutia was named as the executor in the will of my children's father (all minors), who left…read morehis entire estate to our children. Despite this, Mr. Urrutia has failed to communicate with us. I attempted multiple phone calls and sent certified letters, all of which went unanswered. My attorney also contacted him, after which Mr. Urrutia responded by stating that he is not the executor of the will, even though the will explicitly identifies him as such. I am currently pursuing legal action regarding this matter, including claims of professional misconduct. I am in possession of a copy of the will.

Super nice and helpful! I would recommend Johnny to help with your lawyer needs. Office close to…read moredowntown- easy to get to.

First and foremost, Stephen positioned himself as the middleman in a legal matter for profit. I…read morewas clear that Stephen was not my lawyer, as I was representing myself Pro Se. However, against my better judgment, Stephen insisted that I should trust a server he recommended. When issues inevitably arose, this server completely stopped communicating with me and insisted that everything go through Stephen. It quickly became apparent that the only reason I continued to pay him for his so-called "legal advice" was because I needed him to rectify the problems he had introduced. The server Stephen recommended was not only unreliable but also highly unprofessional. They missed deadlines, were late in serving the necessary documents, and, shockingly, there was even an instance where they failed to serve the Respondent the complete writ order. This monumental blunder had a devastating impact on my case in court, and I finally told them both to end this madness. Instead of an apology or five, Stephen then had the audacity to send me a final bill for services I never received! It's incredibly frustrating and disheartening to think that there are people like Stephen out there who are willing to take advantage of individuals in vulnerable situations. I hardly received any legal advise, Stephen came in unprepared so I would have to repeat what the session was booked for, and when I literally booked him to prep me for a next day hearing, he didn't think I had one scheduled! Protect yourself and your interests, and seek out reputable professionals who genuinely have your best interests at heart. Stephen is unequivocally not one of them. Avoid Stephen at all costs.

Extremely knowledgeable, helpful and listens. Definitely recommend. They work quickly when you…read morehave a question. They also have a helpful, efficient way of organizing your case that makes everything run smoothly, especially with something so very important and complicated. I have hired several lawyers in the past and Stephen by far is the best - solid work ethic, easy to talk to, and he is of the highest caliber of lawyers, and a good sense of humor.

My experience with Walters Gilbreath and Jake Gilbreath was beyond extraordinarily disappointing…read moreand a total waste of time and money. They completely failed me and my children. Jake billed me more than $107,000 before I finally changed attorneys, and the results and level of representation I received did not come close to justifying half of those fees. Despite the stakes of my divorce and SAPCR proceedings, my deposition preparation consisted of a Zoom call lasting less than 40 minutes. I was not adequately prepared for significant areas of questioning that arose during the deposition. Jake also failed to adequately communicate how rapidly my legal fees were escalating. On May 8, 2026, I was informed for the first time that the firm claimed I owed an additional $48,177.34, after I had already paid $59,432.65. The lack of results was equally frustrating. Over approximately four months, Jake was not even able to successfully resolve the return of my personal possessions from my former spouse. I was paying an extraordinary amount of money while watching basic issues remain unresolved. Most concerning, I did not receive the strategic guidance, preparation, communication, and advocacy I expected from an attorney charging these rates. I hired Jake expecting an experienced family-law attorney who would protect my interests and provide clear direction during one of the most consequential legal matters of my life. That was not my experience. I eventually changed attorneys, but by then I had been billed more than $107,000 thousand dollars and was left not even making it to first base in the process. He couldn't even get my possesions back for me over a 3 month period. Completely useless. Based on my firsthand experience, I strongly recommend looking elsewhere before hiring Walters Gilbreath. Do not assume that an expensive attorney or firm's reputation guarantees effective representation. I wish I had.

While others may have had positive experiences, my experience was frustrating…read more This law firm is representing my ex-husband who had an existing child support order but did not make payments, requiring me to pursue enforcement through the court. On the day of the hearing, just before the judge entered, my ex paid the full amount owed online through the OAG system. By that point, I had already incurred approximately $3,000 in legal fees to enforce a clear court-ordered obligation. Given that my ex paid child support minutes before the judge walked into the court room, she asked what the purpose of the hearing was and my ex- husband's attorney said it was to discuss the legal fees associated with with the child support enforcement. If my ex would've paid child support, we wouldn't have needed this hearing and thus a discussion over legal fees wouldn't have been needed. It is disappointing that the matter was not resolved earlier by his attorney at this law firm as the hearing ultimately served NO purpose. From my perspective, the only party who appeared to benefit from this process was the law firm.