I'm only reviewing my personal experience with the OB-Gyn I saw (Dr. Deka), NP Margaret, and the office staff.
In my experience, this practice felt very focused on efficiency and billing structure, and less aligned with the kind of patient-centered care I was hoping for. This is a longer review, but I think the context matters.
I began seeing Dr. Deka for my first pregnancy in October after moving to the area. The office was nearby and had decent reviews. At my initial appointment, I was asked to pay the full amount for prenatal care and delivery before I had met Dr. Deka or had confirmation she would be the delivering physician. I wasn't sure if this was standard for the area, but I agreed because I didn't want to lose continuity of care.
That day, I did not see Dr. Deka and instead saw her NP. The visit itself was routine (heartbeat check, urine test). The NP discussed vaccinations, which I understand is part of standard care, but I felt uncomfortable being repeatedly encouraged after I had already declined.
At my next appointment, I met Dr. Deka. She appeared knowledgeable and professional, and I had a positive first impression.
As my pregnancy progressed, I wanted to discuss my birth plan. These conversations were deferred earlier on, which I accepted. However, at 36, 37, and 38 weeks, when I attempted to discuss my preferences in more detail, the discussion remained very limited. I felt my wishes beyond "natural birth" were not fully explored or acknowledged.
When I went into labor at 39 weeks, my water broke and labor was progressing. I was informed by hospital staff that Dr. Deka recommended starting Pitocin early. I had previously expressed that I wanted to avoid interventions unless medically necessary, so I declined. I felt continued pressure to agree, which was stressful for me during labor. Ultimately, my labor progressed naturally, Dr. Deka arrived closer to delivery, and my daughter was born vaginally. The delivery itself was uncomplicated and was described as "textbook."
After giving birth, I returned to the office months later for what I believed was a routine preventive Pap smear. I later received bills indicating the visit was coded as a non-preventive office visit. When I contacted billing for clarification, I was told the coding would not be changed, despite my intake form indicating the reason for the visit was an annual well-woman exam. This was frustrating and unexpected.
The front office staff were consistently pleasant, responsive, and helpful. They remembered me and answered questions promptly, and they were the most positive part of my experience. This is the main reason I'm leaving two stars instead of one.
Dr. Deka may be a good fit for some patients. However, if having detailed discussions about your birth preferences and feeling aligned on approach is important to you, I would recommend making sure expectations are clearly discussed early on. read more