Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Midwest Roofing

    4.1 (9 reviews)
    Open 8:00 am - 5:00 pm

    Services - Midwest Roofing

    Attic inspection

    Roof cleaning

    Roof inspection

    4 More Services

    New roof installation

    Roof repair

    Roof replacement

    Reroofing

    Midwest Roofing Photos

    Recommended Reviews - Midwest Roofing

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    1 year ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 months ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    2 years ago

    Midwest Roofing did outstanding work on our roof and completed the entire roof in one day. Thank you!

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Mr W.
    0
    16
    0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1

    7 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Midwest Roofing

    Roof Lux

    Roof Lux

    (3 reviews)

    Very helpful on my repair. I had some leaks because of the hail damage and they fixed my issue…read morequick.

    Unfortunately our experience has been much different than the previous reviews...I'm still holding…read moreout hope that Roof Lux will make everything right & that my experience improves and thus my review to a positive one. My husband & I met with a Rep from Roof Lux in Jan 2021, signed the contact and paid our half-down deposit on Feb 6th...bottom line, we are still waiting on our siding... upon signing we were told we would have siding in about 4 weeks, about 4 weeks later we were then given a start date of April 9th, we received a call right around the projected April start date and informed that our siding hadn't been ordered yet...and that it wouldn't be here until mid-June. We spoke with our Rep about other options, we spoke with the owners about other options and were assured (it was the beginning of May at this point) that he could get it done & that the siding would be here in 3-4 weeks. We finally received a call that siding was being delivered last Friday (June 4th.) We then received a call that they would plan to start on Wednesday (June 9th) with a subsequent call moving that start date to Thursday (June 10th)...today...and unfortunately we haven't seen or heard from anyone. We have been working with Roof Lux since February, our check was deposited in February...it's mid-June and we still have no siding. Times are busy, the construction industry is swamped, parts are hard to get...we get all of that, however this is extreme and due to poor business practices, not lack of product at this point.

    Black & White Roofing

    Black & White Roofing

    (3 reviews)

    First, I can only speak about my experience dealing with Black & White Roofing. Unfortunately it…read morewas not as good as it seems others had experienced. I am willing to talk to anyone about my experience and I can send pictures or you're welcome to come see the quality of work for yourself. Due to google space or typed characters restrictions, I can not say as much as I would like so this review is limited. Joe McDevitt did put a lien on my house in lieu of trying to resolve the differences after I had expressed my issues and concerns after receiving final invoice. I have full email exchange that can be shared. This review is being posted after the lien issue had been resolved. Issues with quality of work. Here are a few items: - Siding was damaged and Joe McDevitt did not fix it or offer to fix it. - Leaf guard for the guttering was removed and Joe McDevitt did not replace it or offer to replace it. - A 20' +/- walk way that they re-decked but didn't use pressure tread lumber in parts and slats bounce. - In some areas of the Bitumen (Rolled material for low slope roofs) the workmen created some areas of surface damage / scuff marks. - The trim pieces between siding and roof were attached using the yellow colored Decking screws. The screws were not set flush to the wood and protrude about 3/16" high which makes painting ugly and is just visually ugly. - The caulking applied on the trim looks very unprofessional. - They left a small (about 2' vertical area) of exposed facia left (see picture) - The Bitumen roofing material is not overlayed properly on the downhill slope in a couple of places. - The solution to "Extend the Roof" has it's issues too. Issues with billing invoice amounts. To help support some of my next comments, you may go to the Missouri case net website and look up case number 25CM-ML00022. Now, as a contractor to add a little to the billing that a sub-contractor charges is common practice but, let's see if you think the couple of items I will outline here are reasonable in your opinion? There are others items of interest but the 2 below are the most note worthy. One of the thing interests is that the 'Markup' was wide spread in regards to different items of work that the sub-contractor charged and what Joe McDevitt charged me... Meaning 30% for this 40% for that, 500% for something else. - Invoice from Rangel Roofing for "Reframing" (2nd form the bottom in Exhibit D first page) Charge to Black & White $600.00. Black & White Charge to me $3200.00 marked only as "Framing" (4th from the bottom in Exhibit E). What work was actually done you may be asking? There was 24 +/- feet of the sub-facia board replace with I believe 2X10 treated material. THAT IS IT! None of the rafters were replaced or any other noticeable work done. And for context, the 'Bad Shape' is a reference to the facia board being rotten due to water damage. The Rafters seemed OK as I saw the workers walking across them before any work had been done and in pictures you can still see parts of the insolation attached to the original boards. Hence, not replaced. - In Exhibit D (2nd from the Bottom,) "Prep & extend roof to concrete." This work was done by a "Commercial" roofer and there isn't a billing item from them in the case filed on Exhibit D so I don't know what was charged to Black & White roofing. But, I was charged $3000.00. What work was done for that $3000.00? The work area was about 50' X 2'... 1) Power washing for cleaning of the concrete. 2) A "Sealant" was rolled out over the concrete. 3) Some type of flat roofing material (Might be Soperma) was rolled out on top of the sealant of the concrete and tucked up under the Bitumen at roofs edge that hung over the facia board. They original had a drip edge but that was removed when the Soperma was installed. 4) A roofing tar was applied to the edge of the rolled flat roofing material. Again, there are other items of interest that can be compared between Exhibits D and E. I've posted a few images but there are more. Thanks for reading.

    They replaced my roof four years ago, did a shoddy job. It's leaking now, should be under warranty,…read morebut they don't respond to phone calls, email, or their own web form. I had to involve the Attorney General, who doesn't care, either.

    Midwest Roofing - roofing - Updated May 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...