I did not attend this school, but I had several types of exposure to this school, enough to form a fairly solid, consistent opinion.
When I was in 9th grade, my parents allowed me to take a tour of several high schools, including this school, J.P. McCaskey, and Lancaster Mennonite High I chose to attend McCaskey, the public school, and I think this was the right decision for me. I know less about this school for the earlier grades, but I did visit it a few times. I have a close friend who attended it during middle school and high school, and my brother, 7 years younger, also attended it for middle school only.
Lancaster Country Day School is a mixed bag. Academically, it offers notably stronger reading, writing, and history education than the public schools, but, in my opinion, it lags behind in all other areas, including mathematics, science, music, and it lags even farther behind in "supplementary" areas such as home economics and industrial technology, in which the public schools excel. Language instruction can be better or worse, depending on the individual teacher--but in my opinion language instruction is poor in both schools, as it is started too late. Course offerings, at the high school level, are generally inferior to J.P. McCaskey, which offers an extremely aggressive AP Course curriculum. One major downside of LCDS Academics, however, is that students are given much more homework than in the public schools--and in my opinion, they don't necessarily learn more as a result. This places children solidly on the "achievement" track, teaching them to value hard work for the sake of hard work, as opposed to being driven by learning and productive output, and learning to find ways to achieve maximum results with minimal work. In short, I think this school prepares people to be hard workers rather than intelligent, efficient workers.
One of the main advantages of going here rather than the public schools is that the students here are treated with more respect. It's a smaller school, and there are fewer disciplinary problems, so students are generally given the benefit of the doubt and not required to follow strict and bureaucratic policies such as carrying hall passes and requiring permission to go anywhere in the school. This creates a much more pleasant day-to-day environment in the school. Personally, I think it is a huge advantage--kids will behave more responsibly and will mature more quickly if they are given more responsibility. LCDS understands this and acts accordingly.
Another main advantage of LCDS, especially over the public schools, is college advising. College advising in the Lancaster City Schools is exceptionally poor, to the point where the guidance counselors are often a hindrance, rather than help, to the college application process. LCDS doesn't have exceptional or outstanding advising, but from what I know it is generally solid and competent, unlike the public schools.
---
All this said, LCDS has some major downsides, besides just the weaker academics in certain areas, which is why I have boldly chosen to give it only 3 stars.
The student body here is notably less diverse than the student body of the public school system, both in terms of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, culture, values, and other characteristics. I think that exposure to diversity at a young age is critical for one's education if one is to be successful in this modern world. A student attending LCDS will have many advantages over students attending public school, but the lack of exposure to diversity will be a hidden handicap. My most successful friends to attend LCDS did not attend it continually through from elementary school through high school, but rather, had some mixed experiences, attending here for some period and attending public school at some point.
It's also worth mentioning the culture of illegal drug use here. From my experience, there was significantly less marijuana use here, compared to Catholic High, and perhaps less even than the public schools. Also, notably, there was significantly less drug dealing, relative to Catholic High (which seems to be the drug-dealing capital of Lancaster schools). However, there was significantly more cocaine use among the student body, than there was in the public school. I knew of very little cocaine use in the public school. This may be a function more of socioeconomic status than anything else. And take this with a grain of salt--it's my own anecdotal evidence from my rather narrow network of friends who attended this school. It could just be a random result of whom I happened to know (or not know).
That said, LCDS is a good option available. It complements some of the strengths and weaknesses of the public school system. However, it is not uniformly better than the public schools, and indeed, offers some substantial drawbacks--it is not ideal for everyone, even not considering the cost of tuition. read more