Helios has been a big disappointment.
Certainly there is no single definition of gifted children or single approach for their education. Do schools label themselves as "gifted education" actually serve the needs for gifted children? Do they really care? Or is gifted education just a brand? It's like buying a box of cereal branded as "healthy" or a bottled drink branded as "slim" and naively expect to feel and look great after consuming the products. "Healthy" and "slim" are simply marketing slogans. Similarly, "gifted education" sells. The marketing is appealing, but do they walk the talk.
Helios was founded in 2010, following Nueva (1967), Odyssey (1997), and Synapse (2008) to brand itself as a gifted school. All of them emphasize "project-based" learning and social emotional learning (SEL). The similarity is not surprising if you know that pretty much the same people have been involved. Founders of Synapse and Helios came from Nueva, and Odyssey's former head is now at Helios. Since they all speak the same language, why do they hop from one school to another like playing musical chairs? What did they fail to find in one school and look for in the next school?
The answer is perhaps power, and that explains a lot of things at Helios. Despite its small size, there are numerous non-teaching administrators with prestigious titles - a gifted consultant who is not allowed to talk to parents, an art specialist who does not teach, a tech director who does not update the website, a director of communication who does not answer emails, and two curriculum directors who have so far failed to create a curriculum. There is also censorship of community emails and exclusion of opinionated parents. Teacher turnover is quite significant.
If you think a gifted school offers accelerated subject learning, you are in the wrong place. Helios is more a laid back, stress-free school flavored with Northern Californian spirituality (or rather ideology) plus Silicon Valley materialism. If you happen to be wealthy and your kids are the easygoing physical and social kind they may actually be very happy here. They get to make, create, and get dirty.
That said, what they can learn from school is dubious. Significantly, what Helios did to make itself stand out (from Nueva and Synapse) is to get rid of the standard IQ tests for admission. Instead they do "Qualitative Assessment" (QA). The student is not asked to read, draw, or solve problems in the process. While standardized IQ tests have their limits and flaws, they are objective. QA is subjective if not arbitrary or a formality. Using QA as the sole evaluating tool leads to admitting easygoing, sociable, articulate extroverts. Apparently for the school conversational skills are more important than intelligence.
"Project-based learning" is a noble and trendy term. Every semester they come up with a whimsical new topic--Mars, Shakespeare, Corn, Aliens--and teach all subjects under the big umbrella. In theory each topic has great potential for integrated studies (for "corn" you can teach Maya civilization, colonization and slavery, and genetics). In practice nothing of the kind takes place because the teachers lack such training. There is no structure, no established curriculum or textbook, no past experience to learn from. The poor teachers are left on their own to learn about the new subject in the last minute, make a reading list from scratch, and design classroom activities and assignments. What can you expect? The teachers come from Craigslist, not Stanford. How much can they really offer.
The emphasis on "teamwork" only exposes the low teaching quality. Students are often given a storybook to read and to "discuss" (find 5 big words to share with class). After they finish a book they get another, always fiction, rinse and repeat. Teachers don't intervene. If they need to learn things they use Wikipedia (called "research"). For hours a day they "write" (copying Wikipedia). Teachers just watch. How does this education prepare them for high school, college or real life? There is neither breadth nor depth. The quality of curricular planning and teaching is amateurish. Students are bored, and don't learn a thing.
The marketing of SEL is misleading. In every class there is an ostracized kid or two suffering verbal and even physical bullying, getting pushed around or knocked over. The school ignores it, sides with powerful parents, and blames the victims. Several students left the school, some in the middle of school year, for this very reason.
If you look beyond the academic and SEL, there is no art or music except for lower grades. There is no health education, science lab, or sports facilities.
In general the school is disorganized and suffers poor leadership. The school head is more a politician than an educator. Despite all the slogans and rhetoric, you feel that their heart is not there. There is neither sincerity nor expertise. Helios is gifted education betrayed. read more