DO NOT HIRE OR TRUST THIS EVALUATOR!!!
DON FALLIN IS DISHONEST!!!
READ THE ATTACHED APPELLATE FINDINGS CONDEMING DR. DON FALLIN....(Don't just take my word alone) See link below
I have been complaining for years about Fallin but now I finally have the proof I needed to publicly expose him.
Don Fallin conducted the 730 Eval for my case and completely ruined my family and now my daughter's life has been placed into jeopardy since being under the exclusive custody of her proven mentally ill mother. The child has been suffering and had several 5150's for suicidal behaviors while under the mother's exclusive care (and she is a nurse!).
We were sent to the evaluation due to suspicions of mental illness by one of the by Family Court Services Mediatiors. All tests confirmed in the mother psychopathology existed but Dr Fallin downplayed it and rather made a big deal about irrelevant and unreliable information unfavorable to me.
Fallin is guilty of doing to me (Father) what he did in the following attached case to the man.
Fallin told me privately that the mother had lied about the abuse and had also tampered with our child during the course of the investigation. None of those facts ever showed up in his report to the court!! He whitewashed the mom instead and talked about absolute garbage concerning me.
Rather Fallin belabored irrelevant details concerning my private life and hearsay from two dubious collaterals in my case while ignoring the mountain of positive refrences I had.
Fallin altered testimony from other collaterals in support of me that he interviewd and twisted their words to show me in unfavorable light.
One witness was a court assigned professional who wrote to tell Fallin to correct errors in his written report of their statement. Fallin refused and submitted the uncorrected report to the court anyway which angered the witness.
Fallin did clear me of the "choking" allegation of the child which came ONLY from the mom but he did not just plainly state that the mom had lied. Fallin wrote 65 pages of confusing and contradictory garbage that the known childless and gender biased Commissioner Elizabeth Hendrickson cherry-pick. I was in pro per and was completely abused by the whole system. Now I have this other case to point to as vindication for the crimes against me by Dr Don Fallin.
The excerpt from the case is as follows:
[See Link below to view Complete Appellate Ruling]
[In re the Marriage of JOHAN and
TIMOTHY LANE BURKES]
"The court also criticized the evaluator's report for omitting any reference to
Mother's 2005 arrest for driving under the influence. (Mother was pregnant at the time) While the court observed that this could have been a simple oversight, the omission supported Father's view that Dr. Fallin consistently omitted or discounted information that was unfavorable to Mother while emphasizing or exaggerating information critical of him. In the same vein, the court found Dr. Fallin had misinterpreted or exaggerated a conversation with Max's preschool director in a way that was unfair to Father and placed unwarranted reliance on Mother's version of events. The court also concluded that Dr. Fallin's view that Father " 'defiantly refused to follow [Max's] preschool curriculum' " and that his " 'attitude about the
importance of academics likely would not change' " was unfounded.
The court had additional concerns about the evaluator's opinions. One conflict between the parents concerned whether Max, who appeared to show signs that he is left-handed, should, as Father at one point believed, be encouraged to use his right hand. The court observed that Dr. Fallin implicitly ignored the possibility that Max might be ambidextrous and concluded Max is left-handed, despite conceding that he is not an expert in the subject. The court explained: "It is not important to the court whether the minor is left-handed or right-handed for some particular or for all purposes. What is more significant to the court is that the evaluator, despite acknowledging he was not an expert in the subject, opined on the subject in a way that was critical and challenging of the respondent." Similarly, Dr. Fallin testified that it took six hours to fly from San Francisco to Quebec City, but did not consider the actual travel time between the two cities. This, the court found, was "illustrative of other instances in which, intentionally or not, [Dr. Fallin] presented information a way that is favorable to [Mother]." Considering the time necessary for ground transportation, check-in for an international flight, retrieval of luggage, and customs and immigration, the court noted that actual travel time was likely double the six hours Dr. Fallin reported."
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/A134335.PDF&ved=0ahUKEwjooPnQkKzUAhVHxFQKHVuPDqcQFgjtATAf&usg=AFQjCNHiQedE5KLlZZFSCgx1_Tl6zToZOw&sig2=9PX76I-Idezg1K6783lvDA read more