Mr. McLarty of McLarty Wolf patiently guided me through a legal Commiteeship application through…read morethe BC courts. I was was greatly impressed with his professionalism, his verbal and written communication skills along with the results he provided. He was able to successfully complete my application to the courts in a timely manner and at a fair cost. I would highly recommend Mr. McLarty and his team.

Dear Ross and Murray, this thank you is long overdue…read more I owe you a great deal of gratitude and appreciation. I am writing to thank you for the overwhelming support you provided and exceptional work you did for me during my personal injury ICBC claim. No doubt, you remember the seriousness of this car accident - it was a miracle everyone involved survived. My severe injuries meant that I could no longer continue schooling for my chosen field. Due to your quick thinking, dedication, and meticulous efforts, not only was I able to immediately change areas of study and finish school on schedule, but your support and guidance also helped me to choose a new career direction - a new career that I truly enjoy to this day. The trial was especially stressful for someone at my young age, however your explanation of the trial processes and advice were especially helpful and comforting during those times. For my case with your guidance, going to trial was the right thing to do and we were able to achieve favourable results. Once again, I want to express my heartfelt gratitude for your support through this tremendously challenging time for me and my family. Thanks to you, I was able to focus on healing and rehabilitation while you both looked after all my current and future needs along with the tough demands of the case. I could not have asked for two better people to be by my side during this extremely difficult time.

Michelle Kooy was my family lawyer for almost a year. Her work was adequate at times, and…read moredefinitely subpar and disorganized at times. There were several problems with her legal work and subsequent lawyers have highlighted some of the inadequacies. For instance, she suggested I contact a financial analyst that she works with regarding a simple question, one that many firms would be able to deal with in-house. I agreed and Michelle was supposed to send the analyst a small number of files for this meeting. I had a meeting with the analyst and was perplexed by the information she had. At the end of the meeting we realized that Michelle had sent her incorrect files, files that were completely out of date. One example of many wasted billed hours. As middling as Michelle's legal work was, it was still far better than the work of associates Sonia Kainth and Shelina Sayani. Sonia was my lawyer for a short period of time and her work was really deplorable. The reason for this became evident soon after, she quit to take a partner position at opposing counsel after a couple of months. It's extremely questionable that she decided to take me on as a client. Sonia referred me to Shelina Sayani. Shelina's "work" was incredibly unprofessional from the outset and only got worse over time. After terminating Shelina, Michelle represented me. Michelle made some very serious accusations about Shelina's conduct, which are very well documented. And then several months after that Michelle decided to hire Shelina. Billable hours trump ethics. Nobody at this firm has any business pretending to practice collaborative family law.

From the owner: Broadhurst Kooy LLP are family lawyers in Vancouver, delivering the personalized help you need in a…read morestraightforward approach. Contact us for a free initial consultation.

Jon Conlin is a great tech lawyer in Vancouver! He works hard and knows a lot.read more

I had to hire these guys recently for legal advice due to a situation with a past employer,…read morehowever, due to the nature of the situation cannot give details. These guys spoke to me as if I was a human being. Made me feel confident and were honest about the outcome. They didn't sugar coat anything which was much appreciated.

The Access Pro Bono Society of British Columbia (APB) is an advocacy non-profit in downtown…read moreVancouver that no doubt opened with the best of intentions but unfortunately falls far short of the practice standards set by the lawyers' professional governing body, the Law Society of British Columbia. Most grievously, it is the poorest of the poor, APB's clientele, who suffer. APB creates an illusion that legal representation in the way the law society defines it is available when it is not. It's a convenient fiction that allows the legal establishment to assume wrongly that poor litigants are being properly advised. In many cases, nothing could be further from the truth. The law society should investigate ASAP. Despite an overabundance of law graduates desperately seeking articles there seems to be a chronic shortage at APB of both qualified students and advising lawyers, those who do not have a conflict of interest, particularly in the area of bankruptcy and foreclosure law, surely the cornerstone of poverty law. In addition, APB advocates frequently miss appointments, including actual court dates. Emails and calls go unacknowledged, unanswered and unreturned. There seems to be no rule or procedure regarding communication. In many cases, client has no idea the night before his hearing whether mouthpiece will turn up. If s/he does, in many cases s/he does so without having properly researched the law to come up with a defence such that trier of fact may assume there is no defence. As a result, many litigants lose not only their opportunity to raise a defence, they may also lose the right to appeal. Several APB advisers seemed to have no idea how to help a client apply for public benefits either emergency funding or disability benefits, again, the cornerstones of poverty law. It's very troubling when a legal adviser admits that s/he lacks expertise and yet makes no effort to obtain it either at the law library or from an advising lawyer. There seems to be no effort to test the facts with a practitioner, one who might be willing to provide representation on contingency. No such list of experts seems to exist at APB. Why not? Because beggars cannot be choosers, few litigants will risk a complaint to the law society about the service they received at APB. Many may not know they have the right to complain. I would urge everyone who has obtained questionable representation by this organization to review the experience with the law society. APB is not alone in its dubious commitment to service, either. There are a number of these organizations purporting to provide legal services to the poor. Too often actual representation never quite materializes. Too many of these advocates seem to feel that they have discharged their professional obligations by sending client an email with links to suggested legal websites and citations only another lawyer would understand. What's needed is problem-solving - the application of relevant law to a client's problem/s. That surely is what is expected when one seeks legal advice! Again, the law society should investigate ALL of Vancouver's poverty law clinics immediately and come up with proposals to address an access to justice crisis in B.C. that is getting worse not better. If the law society is unable or unwilling to discharge its obligation to protect the public interest by ensuring sufficient access to quality legal representation perhaps it's time to compel the province to end the lawyers' monopoly and allow consumers to choose our own advisers. Law, after all, is not rocket science. Anyone can learn to read and interpret law. There is no special magic to it. A few words about the not pro bono fees and disbursements APB advocates are entitled to bill: '... APB will dispense up to $300 to the Roster Lawyer on a pre-authorized basis, such that the Roster Lawyer need not itemize the particular disbursements. If the case is settled, abandoned or otherwise closed prior to filing court or tribunal documents, APB reserves the right to request an itemized description of disbursements from the Roster Lawyer and to recover any and all unused amounts from the $300 paid out. Subsequent to the initial disbursement coverage of up to $300, Roster Lawyers may request further disbursement coverage of up to $2200 ($2500 including the initial $300) by submitting the Disbursements Billing Form to APB along with receipts for all itemized disbursements. APB authorizes disbursements according to the criteria set out below. APB also maintains the discretion to provide disbursement coverage in excess of $2500 to single cases showing exceptional merit or substantial impact on social justice issues. ...' Unlike their U.S. counterparts, the University of B.C. (UBC) law faculty has few, if any, community law clinics that partner students with local practitioners/law profs. Why not hire profs able to set up and manage such a clinic? There is surely a glut of qualified candidates.

"Beggars can't be choosers", as Leonard (last reviewer) quotes in his review of Access Pro Bono,…read moreexactly the line that came to mind upon leaving their office this afternoon. I tried to "re-book" an appointment with Access Pro Bono to seek advice from a lawyer regarding my upcoming trial. I did go to my previous appointment, but, went to the wrong room in the wrong building. I went to the room in the building I'd been to many times previously. I didn't realize they used both law court buildings and consequently missed my appointment; rookie mistake. A sky train and two bus rides (each way; there and home again) AND of course something had gone wrong with the sky train (again!) so I even had to run from Chinatown to the Law Courts carrying a bag filled with binders to make this appointment on time; I was in tears, when I thought the lawyer was a "no show" (as Lenord also points out, it wouldn't have been the first time the appointed lawyer just didn't show up). In this case, it was my fault, I went to the wrong room in the wrong building. I phoned the APB office the very next day to report what I thought to be a "no show" and re-book a new appointment (I had waited almost a month already for this appointment). I was told on "no uncertain terms" that it was in fact "I" who would go down in their records as the "no show". This morning they returned my last msg. and I tried to explain the mix up. The line was garbled and breaking up (I'm pretty sure that was coming from their line) so I took the skytrain and two buses to their office downtown and showed up in person to make the appointment. I was sent home and told that they do not "encourage" people to come to their office in person; I tried to explain about the phone line situation but was absolutely rebuffed and shown the door. Someone from the office phoned me when I got home. The person, coldly, roboticly, repeatedly, emphasized that I was a "no show", and said I should have known better where to go. As a "punitive measure" for my "no show" (they insist is not punitive but rather "policy"), I am not allowed to even book an appointment for 30 days at which point it will take aprox. another 30 days to get in to see someone (who may or may not show up). Even the opposing lawyer went there in person to ask them to reconsider, but the person he spoke to was unmoved. Because of this I had to request a postponement of the trial. Another appointment I had thru APB was with a lawyer based out in Coquitlam. I made the two hour by transit trek there (and two hours back again) just to have the appointed lawyer sit there with arms and legs crossed and coldly reply to each and every question "you should look it up on line"; despite my having gone so far as to write out my questions, and send them in advance (as requested) of the appointment. His entire demeanor implied disdain. Many of my visits with these lawyers and dealings with APB staff have seemed oddly aloof at best. Considering the noble implications of this being a volunteer organization I have often wondered and have even inquired, as to what the angle is on this "volunteer" part of the service. I can't help but feel there is something amiss here, and more to the story than what is told. The staff at APB are, in my recent experience, remarkably "unsympathetic" and "rigid" (to say the very least) and come across as anything but "noble" in their endevours, and given that, I find it really hard to buy that this is an entirely philanthropic venture.

Spent 2 years with Virgin Hickman until my lawyer KL went on maternity leave (which was undisclosed…read moreto me until 4 weeks before her leave) Unfortunately, we made absolutely no progress in my case during those 2 years. I paid my bills diligently (maybe $30,000?). As soon as KL went on maternity leave, I inquired for a senior lawyer - I was given 1 week by Mark Virgin to find new counsel or he would file an intention to withdraw. He did not even recommend an alternative counsel for me. I scrambled to find a new lawyer and we sent the request for my file transfer. After nearly 2 weeks and several emails to various staff members (MR, BB, KM, CH) requesting my file to be transferred, I received this email today from my new counsel. "We've just received your file from your former counsel. It has been sent somewhat in the form of a "document dump," meaning they have sent a zip folder with hundreds of documents not organized in any particular fashion. It will take some time to organize these and save them all to our file. I will wait to review the documents until they are organized, as it will take less time that way, so this process will likely not start until next week." Do NOT waste your time or money with this firm.

Comforting, reassuring, patient and kind. Betcha didn't think I was going to be giving 5 sexy stars…read moreto Mark Virgin, but I just cannot think of one good reason not to. Sure, he's a lawyer, and I'm sure there's many a yelper who is slapping their knee silly with all of the lawyer related jokes running through their heads, but you know what? This guy doesn't mess around. When I was in a car accident a number of years ago, Mark represented me. The case took 3 years to settle. That's 3 years of lawyer visits and never once did I feel like he or his team were "in it for the money." At the same time, I felt like every step of the way, they were looking out for my best interest, carefully explaining what was happening so I wouldn't get lost in all of the legal mumbo-jumbo. There's a reason why, in the time that I have known Mark, his team has expanded to 16 lawyers. They're awesome at what they do... plus they have a nespresso machine which makes visits all the more sweet. I'm glad my case never made it to court, but I have a feeling he would've been a pitbul, defending my side til the end, which is good when you're going up against some big corporate guns.

Hermann is very professional and answers your queries thoroughly and speedily. He is very…read moretrustworthy and comfortable to work with

From the owner: General civil litigation, business and construction law, family agreements and divorce, estate…read morelitigation and challenging of wills.

One of the top legal offices probably in the country. Howard Shapray aside. Mr. Cramer maybe the…read moresmartest man I have ever come across I know if I ever had any type of securities issues I would rely on these guys. The only thing I will knock is this both named partners are tremendously busy and so often you have to deal with someone who isn't ideal. But remember to work there they are all special.

Updated our wills with Winright Law. Absolutely perfect experience with the majority of the work…read moredone by email and phone. In person only required to sign the final documents. Professional, timely and friendly service.

*** An update re: the below. I am happy that Winright reached out to me, answered my legal…read morequestion and assured me they will look into preventing the below from happening again. Great customer service, now I see why they have such great reviews here:). I was very disappointed in the way my case was handled with Winright. I contacted them initially on a Saturday via Yelp and followed up Monday. The friendly receptionist asked me to send in the paper work for the law team to review if they could help me. As time was of the essence, I quickly responded and sent in what they requested Monday. I followed up with an email Tuesday and when I did not hear back nearing the end of that day I phoned to enquire when I could set up an appointment. I was saddened to hear that the firm is too busy with other cases and they could not forsee a time when they could discuss my case with me. This exercise unfortunately cost me precious time in receiving an opinion on a time limited case. I am extremely disappointed they did not inform me from the beginning that they didn't have the time to meet with me (for 30 min!) to give an opinion. I wish I was posting another 5 star review after using their services, but my experience with them was anything but.