I came across this public art piece near Mass Ave and I thought, "What kind of degenerate is going to push the button and make the sign say 'Don't Care'? And why give people a choice? Just make it say 'Care' and don't give anyone an option, and everyone will be happy." Before I walked away, I made sure that the sign said "Care," and I felt satisfied.
But I've been thinking about this piece a lot since I saw it about a week ago. I've been thinking about it especially in relation to my yoga and meditation practice. One of the things I've been working on in my life is something in yoga that's called aparigraha, or non-attachment. It boils down to not caring about things so dang much -- especially things that are out of your control or things that are impermanent.
So, I've been pondering this concept of non-attachment, and then I come across this artwork. My initial response -- "The sign needs to say 'Care'! Everyone needs to care about everything all the time always!" -- is a noble response and probably most people's response. But now that I've had time to think about this art piece, I've come to a different conclusion. Maybe "Don't Care" isn't a "bad" thing? Why ascribe judgement to the idea of caring or not caring? One isn't better than the other -- they are just concepts that are fluid and can mean different things to different people in different situations. Not caring can sometimes be freeing, and caring can be stifling. And conversely, caring can be beneficial, and not caring can be ruinous.
Good art makes people think, and this one really made me evaluate everything. So the next time I come across this piece of art, I might just press the button to make it say "Don't Care," and I'll walk away happy. read more