I contacted the office to deal with a jurisdictional custody matter. Stephanie gave me a free…read moreconsult and took her time listening to me and coming up with a strategy. The team works together to respond in a timely manner. I would recommend both Stephanie and Richard if you're looking for transparent representation.

They took money, did nothing, and asked for more money before doing anything…read more I highly recommend you do not contact this fraud lawyer

I am thankful for Jeff Dean saving me from what could have been years of uncertainty and problems…read more Jeff was not only highly skilled and knowledgeable in the law, but also upfront about the potential outcomes of my case. His proactive defense strategy was brilliant, his commitment to my case was strong, and the communications were excellent. If you're facing criminal charges you are in good hands with Jeff Dean as your lawyer.

If you need a good lawyer to get you out of a bad situation then Jeffrey Dean is who you should…read morecall. I had a complicated and tough case and Jeffrey figured out how to win it. I am forever grateful to him. I now have a bright future in front of me and my worries are gone.

Dan helped me through the process of filing Chapter 7 last year. For a flat fee, he took care of…read morealmost everything, and was there in the Zoom room when I had my appointment with the bankruptcy court. He also generously answered some tax questions this spring after a long communication hiatus. And he's a really nice guy. He is to be highly recommended if you have to do a bankruptcy.

After my five years plus of working with him, Dan has earned a great review. There's nothing about…read morebankruptcy and financial distress that is "easy", but it's clear that Dan works hard to make it as easy and simple as possible. He's clear in his communications, always willing to answer questions, and does a great job of explaining where you are in the journey, and what's next. I pray that I never need his services again, but he's definitely who I would return to if I did!

Obtaining an attorney during a legal issue is never easy. Michael made it easy and was confidently…read morereassuring. He met with me to review the facts of my issues and provided me with options. He was open about costs, as well as possible risks and benefits to my decisions. He spent time prior to hearings reviewing my testimony and offered legal guidance. I had multiple hearings and felt prepared because of Michael's guidance and support. He was there by my side to answer questions and advocated on my behalf. He kept in touch with me via phone, email and fax to address legal documents, which required attention. In the end, I felt the legal advice I received was sound and allowed me to make educated decisions. I trust Michael's legal advice and have recommended him to friend's and acquaintances, looking for legal assistance. I will use Michael's services again should I need an attorney.

I worked with Michael on my licensure defense case against the Board. I called the office to…read moreschedule a consult and Michael agreed to meet with me later that same day. His general availability, flexibility, and genuine willingness make accomodations, in my opinion, demonstrates his wonderful work ethic and person-centered approach with his clients. He was there to provide guidance and support during the most frightening and distressing ordeal of my life. At the consult, Michael was up front about the costs. He did not create any sense of false hope nor speculate unpredictable possible outcomes, which I found refreshing. Communication was excellent as he is available through varying modes (call, text, e-mail.) Michael consistently provided prompt responses, detailed information, and transparent instructions throughout the progress of my case. Michael was patient with my many questions and concerns. He never made me feel rushed when we'd go over the expected time, or feel like any kind of inconvenience. Michael provided excellent assistance with revising and collaborating on the final written response. During the prepping/coaching sessions, he made sure I had ample time to learn & practice those skills to an appropriate comfort level. Michael accompanied me to the review panel. I was quite moved by his opening statement. He possessed sincerity and conviction in his words that displayed genuine support and belief in my case. My case was complex and the cards were seemingly stacked against me, yet in the end the Board fully dismissed every allegation in the case. Michael is genuinely motivated, passionate, and devoted to assisting nurses & others receive justice and fair treatment through his utilization of experience and intellect along with the consistent application of ethical practice. I would highly recommend Michael Weber, without hesitation.

I contacted Karen at KB Law asking for a quote to review documents that I prepared on my own. I…read morewas contacted within minutes of sending the message and was instructed to email the documents for their review and they would tell me the cost for the review. I spoke with Karen the following week and she let me know what changes I needed to make and answered all my questions. I can't praise this firm enough for their professionalism and customer service/response. I recommend anyone that needs legal help to contact KB Law first. You will not be disappointed.

We found ourselves in need of a lawyer and preferred to have someone local. Upon 1st meeting Brent…read moreSchafer we knew that he would be the perfect lawyer for us and he did not disappoint. Took time to explain things and kept us informed during our legal process. Great communication skills and happy with the outcome in the end.

William K Wangensteen kas been my estate attorney since 1982…read more I have found Bill to be honest, competent, and compassionate. He has helped me through the death of two husbands, a complicated conservatorship and end of life paperwork. I highy ecommend him. Take it from someone who has been his client for 43 years.

After several consultations with other lawyers around the Twin Cities I chose Mr. Patterson. I will…read moretell you, it was one of the best decisions that I could've made. He offered me a fair price and allowed me to make payments. More important he got the results that we want. He was always more prepared than the opposing attorney. He was aggressive in court and commanded the respect of the judge. I definitely recommend him!

I was the opposing party in a Dakota County family-court matter in which Clarence Patterson III…read morerepresented the other side. He never represented me. This review concerns my direct experience with his courtroom advocacy and written positions. I understand that attorneys must advocate firmly for their clients. But in family court, words can alter a person's life before disputed facts are fully examined. At an August 28, 2025 hearing, the transcript records Mr. Patterson saying that I "love to talk about guns," that my "relationship with guns is concerning," warning that people could be "caught in the crossfire," and later portraying me as someone who "needs a gun to solve his problems." I stated on the record that I hated guns, had never owned one, and would never have one. I found it profoundly disturbing to be portrayed through repeated gun-related language when I was expressly denying any interest in owning a firearm. The same transcript records Mr. Patterson referring to "his bipolar disorder" while denying my concern that mental-health labeling was being used against me. I experienced the combined gun and mental-health framing as stigmatizing and dehumanizing--an effort to turn disputed allegations into a frightening portrait of an armed and mentally unstable person. A separate and extremely serious discrepancy involved Dakota County Crisis. A sworn filing in the case stated that a crisis-team member had contacted counsel and that the entire office had been alerted about me. A Dakota County Crisis supervisor later wrote that she had searched the system and consulted with colleague supervisors, found no record or recollection of such an alert, found no documentation of a duty-to-warn event, and stated that the team does not communicate directly with attorneys. In my view, a discrepancy involving a claimed government warning was too consequential to be left unresolved. It deserved a prompt, transparent, and documented explanation. Mr. Patterson also asked the court not to consider approximately fifty exhibits because he said he had not received them. I am not claiming in this review that the service objection itself constituted misconduct. I am describing the consequence as I experienced it: severe allegations were presented while a substantial body of my responsive evidence was not considered at that hearing. The matter ultimately resolved by stipulation before the scheduled evidentiary hearing. The most severe characterizations were therefore not adjudicated through that scheduled hearing. The litigation nevertheless caused profound personal, financial, and reputational harm. I found Mr. Patterson's approach unnecessarily escalatory, stigmatizing, and damaging. I would not recommend him. Strong advocacy does not require turning another human being into a caricature of mental illness and violence. Family-law attorneys exercise enormous power, and that power should be matched by factual precision, restraint, professional judgment, and accountability.