I disagree with the review directly below mine. Accommodating is definitely not the word I would use to describe SwimJim's staff, at least by email. I'll explain in detail.
I just learned of SwimJim this past week through another mom in one of my moms groups. She advertised that the classes were free for infants up to 6 months. I thought "what a great idea" especially since we have a pool in our building and I would love to get my little guy started in the water and enroll him in for swim classes. So we signed up on their website hoping to check out a class or two of the "Swim N Splash" program which is the free program for infants up to 5 months (I guess that other mom was wrong or they had changed their policies). The next class offered after that is for 6 months and up called "SwimFants". Since our little guy had never taken swim classes before, we thought it would be great to try the Swim N Splash first before enrolling him in SwimFants.
We received an email from the staff telling us that Swim N Splash is only through 5 months of age and pushing us to enroll in the SwimFants class. Since our little guy had just turned 5 months recently, I asked if it was possible to accommodate us and grant us an exception so that he can attend one Swim N Splash class to see if he would be okay in a class setting in a pool. My reasoning was 1) he had barely turned 5 months and 2) the Swim N Splash class is free to begin with and offered in part, I'm sure, as part of their marketing strategy to get parents to enroll their infants into the paid programs upon satisfaction of completing the free program. I believe my reasoning was sound, not unreasonable and not far reaching. A program intended for babies should understand why a mother would be concerned with enrolling her child in an entire program and not being able to stay in the program since he or she is at such a young and sensitive stage.
The staff did not bend, instead citing that policies are in place for good reason and instead telling me that my child can "observe" a SwimFants class instead. I am not sure how a 5 month old "observing" a swim class can resolve my question which was whether or not my little guy would fare well in a class in a pool setting, so that did not make any sense to me. Also, I am not sure why my 5 month old is allowed to participate in their SwimFants (6 months and up class) when he has not reached 6 months yet, if that is their such policy as well.
I understand that policies are in place for good reason - I practice law after all. For example, it is a good policy to be required to wear swim attire in a pool. It is a good policy to not allow disruptive and belligerent children in a class. It is a good policy to not let a 1 year old into a 5 month and under swim class because they are too far apart in age and it will be hard for the teacher to control and manage an additional child who is so much older. However, it is not good policy to be so rigid that you cannot make one simple accommodation for a potential customer. I cannot believe the staff/SwimJim is so short sighted. To me, it was a clear indication of how future interactions with SwimJim staff would transpire, and as a fulltime working mother, I do not have time for that kind of rigidity and lack of customer care and service, especially once I turn my money in for a full on program. I will be looking for another swim program for my son for sure! read more