Cancel

Open app

Search

Silverblatt Law Office

5.0 (2 reviews)
Closed • Closed

Services - Silverblatt Law Office

Auxiliary legal services

Trust planning

Silverblatt Law Office Photos

You might also consider

Recommended Reviews - Silverblatt Law Office

Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
Yelp app icon
Browse more easily on the app
Review Feed Illustration

1 year ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

5 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

Ask the Community - Silverblatt Law Office

Verify this business for free

Get access to customer & competitor insights.

Verify this business

Law Office of Nancy Perry Eaton - She's says she will withdraw by her own decision.

Law Office of Nancy Perry Eaton

(7 reviews)

I must say, as divorces go, mine went very smooth. I spoke to several attorneys before committing…read moreto Ms. Eaton. Nancy or Marie ALWAYS returned phone calls , emails and texts within 24 hours if not the same day. From our first meeting, Nancy took control of the situation. I was a mess, the staff kept me calm throughout the whole process. I can not say enough good things about Ms Eaton and Marie Benjamin. if your tired of trying to get a hold of your attorney. if your tired of trying to do it yourself. If you're ready for integrity, honesty and accountability, give Ms Eaton and her staff a call. Thanks Ms Eaton for all your help. Michael Huls

This review documents the ongoing pattern of inaction, lack of urgency, and failure to meet basic…read moreprofessional standards exhibited by Nancy throughout her involvement in my case. Her conduct significantly harmed my ability to protect my rights and my daughter's well-being during a highly sensitive and urgent legal process. 1. Failure to Act During an Emergency I approached Nancy desperate and in an emergency situation involving my divorce and my daughter's safety. I made it clear that immediate legal intervention was needed. Despite the urgency, Nancy took no meaningful action to address the situation or to move the case forward. 2. Ignoring Violations of the Temporary Orders I repeatedly informed Nancy about multiple violations of the Temporary Orders, providing details and evidence. She failed to: * file any motions, * advise me on immediate remedies, * notify the court, * or take any steps to enforce the orders or protect my parental rights. Her lack of response left me vulnerable during moments that required urgent legal action. 3. Failure to Present Key Evidence in Court One of the most serious issues was that Nancy did not present crucial evidence in court, evidence that was necessary to support my claims, demonstrate the violations, and show the pattern of behavior affecting my child and this case. This omission directly weakened my position and affected the court's ability to fully understand the facts. 4. Lack of Follow-Through and Progress Throughout her time on my case, Nancy did not prepare essential filings, did not follow up on critical issues, and did not provide a timeline or structure for how we would proceed. The case stagnated under her management. 5. Poor Communication Nancy consistently failed to respond promptly to messages--sometimes not responding at all--especially when the matters were time-sensitive or related to court deadlines. This forced me to handle complicated legal issues without proper support. 6. No Strategy or Guidance Despite my requests for direction, she did not offer a clear strategy, actionable advice, or explanation of the steps needed in my case. I was left without proper representation during a complex legal process. 7. Withdrawal Only After Being Confronted It was only after I confronted her about her inaction and lack of results that she expressed the desire to withdraw from my case. This timing demonstrates avoidance of accountability rather than a professional decision made in my best interest. 8. Harm Caused to My Case Because of her negligence: * evidence was not presented, * violations were ignored, * deadlines were missed or delayed, * and my legal position was weakened unnecessarily. Her inaction caused avoidable stress, confusion, and disadvantage at critical moments. Conclusion Nancy's failure to act during an emergency, her refusal to address violations of the Temporary Orders, and her omission of key evidence in court represent serious breaches of professional duty. This review is submitted to document the harm caused by her inaction and to ensure that future representation meets the standard required to protect my rights and my daughter's well-being.

Wm Barry Phillips

Wm Barry Phillips

(2 reviews)

Do not go to this office ... They drag their feet ... And…read morethe communication is broken , you will not be informed or updated on anything once you pay your money ... They lose documents to Location 1201 South W.S. Young Defiantly take this in consideration

I did it! I found a decent/human attorney!!! Mr. Micco deserves recognition to the MAX for his…read morediligent and ethical work. I happened upon him, by experiencing an absolutely DISGRACEFUL beginning parts of a divorce after hiring the Carlson law firm (Slav Talavera), to be exact....DO NOT GO THERE! But back to my 'buddy', George, after I was cornered into firing the Carlson law firm, because of their greed and inability to finish their job, I began looking elsewhere for a new attorney (really the last thing I wanted to be concerning myself with, while already dealing with one of the most stressful situations of my life), but Mr. Micco was polite and very reasonable, including no 'taking advantage' of my vulnerable situation. I ended up hiring him for the tail end of my nightmare divorce, and he followed true with his price AND everything else that he told me he would complete. I know it may sound like a 'well, yeah, that's what they're supposed to do' review; but BELIEVE ME when I say 'that is NOT always the case!' I really had depleted my energy in this God awful legal matter and relied heavily on Mr. Micco to do what he said he would in order to finish it up...the divorce became slightly complicated just because of my exes unwillingness to 'cooperate', but Mr. Micco never made me feel panicked about anything and ended up FINALLY severing my marriage (THANK GOD)! HIGHLY, HIGHLY RECOMMEND HIM!!! THANK YOU, Mr. Micco!

Baker & Tisdale

Baker & Tisdale

(4 reviews)

These people are not good and so glad that we found Mr Young who use to be a part of this…read moreassociation. They show no compassion and get mad when you question them about your case. Mr. Young was the best man at that place to get the job done and if you ever need a lawyer I recommend him because he will answer all calls and show much compassion and also shows results unlike Baker

Absolutely NOT!!!! If I could give a negative star rating it…read morewould still be too high. After hiring this office, at first, everything went routinely enough. Met with my lawyer Thomas and got all the information hashed out. We went to court and both parties agreed on the terms of the divorce, the split of assets, and had everything read into the court record in front of the judge which he (the judge) signed off on. Done deal right? All I have to do is wait on is the required separation period, sign the paperwork, and it's done, right? WRONG!!! I waited and watched the docket listings for my up-coming case via http://www.co.bell.tx.us/BCC/civilsearch.htm where all court cases are made available to the public. For a month I watched that date get closer and waited for a phone call from the lawyer's office. No call. Two weeks prior to the appearance date, I called the office to "check in". They had no clue! I found out that my first lawyer had left the firm nearly a month prior. They were totally unaware of the upcoming date and a couple of days later they called me in for a "follow up" to make sure we were on "on the same page". In the "follow up" to make sure we were "on the same page", Tisdale knew nothing about my case. I had to go through the whole case again, even though it was ALREADY DONE. Then the day before court I was notified that the date got pushed. No biggie, it happens..... New date set and tracked. I take public transit to the courthouse at 6am to be there for 9am. Tisdale is a no show. I call the office, and after 45 minutes of waiting, I'm told "Oh, the other party's lawyer had to cancel because he had a criminal trial today." When I finally did get to court again, a different lawyer (Baker) shows up. Apparently, Tisdale was on vacation that day. Baker didn't know anything about the case other than it was a divorce. I had to go over the whole case a third time,,, IN THE COURTHOUSE, RIGHT BEFORE STANDING IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE. The other party's lawyer tried to weasel me with "clarifications" (i.e. alimony) he wanted to be amended into the original court recorded and judge approved agreement with which Baker had no problem. I had to raise my own BS flag, show all the documents and explain that the case was already settled and just needed to be closed out. We had to get the courthouse to print up the original transcript from Jan 2018. I even had to supply the near-final draft of the divorce decree written up by Thomas seven months prior from MY thumb drive in order to make sure it got closed out that day. All in an open and shut divorce case took 8 months everything to was agreed to and read into the record in front of the judge to close out. The absolute only thing this law firm was on time and on point for was billing my bank account every month for its retainer fee, and if the funds weren't there I got an immediate email alert that day. Doubt me not, I have retained all the email correspondences, attachments, bank statements, receipts, and phone records to back everything up. Oh, final note. While I was going through all this on the final day, Baker had the gal to ask about my politics in order to solicit for my vote since he was running for state office for this region.

Silverblatt Law Office - legalservices - Updated May 2026

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...