PFC violated my rights 1. Ignoring disputes 2. Not furnishing proof of debt in a timely manner (to date** not at all) 3. by serving an unknown party (No one in my hh received a summons), and not myself. This means information about me can be out there AND they did not give me opportunity to prepare a defense due to the improper service. I found out there was a summons issued against me because of a search that I did in the court database to find out whether or not my separation case was moving forward. When I saw that the case number was not the same, I immediately emailed and then called the court and ask them what this was. This is when they revealed that I need to show up at court, and they gave me PFC phone number. I contacted PFC, and they refused to send me the proof of debt unless I put it in writing, but this meant that there was no time for them to receive and respond to my request for proof of debt before court date. Meanwhile I disputed again, the alleged debt, with my credit bureau, and they found sufficient evidence to be able to delete it. I had to meet with the lawyer when I showed up to the court date that the court gave me, and the lawyer told me that the only reason why the credit bureau deleted it was because I asked for a dispute at least three times. I know that this is not even a true statement! Otherwise, everyone would dispute 3x everything (owed or not) and have 800 credit scores! Lol Also, I informed her during the disputes, I actually accidentally disputed something that was valid (due to my phone auto selects ALL), and that valid debt is still on my credit report and will remain on there until I pay it off. The fact that the lawyer misrepresented how disputed information, once investigated, works is concerning. Additionally, I feel that they may have deliberately withheld information, served the wrong person (violating FCRA by giving 3rd party my info!) if they even served anyone, and gave this false and misleading information in hopes that I would never know about the court date, and they would get a default judgment. I feel that I may not be the only person who has had this happen in the past. Their lawyer also suggested to me, that improper service, though illegal, only delays the processing that I would still be responsible for paying the alleged debt. I let her know that that is not what the law says at all, and also that I know that improper service can cause them to have their case dismissed. She then told me I would not be allowed to collect on any damages based on my defenses as aligned above. She has no way of knowing what I can collect on, and that sounds a lot like a thinly veiled threat to me. She then said that she was willing to do a continuance (or i file answer) to research this account further. However, she was supposed to have her burden of proof for her client already ready to go, because that is WHY they are there. Clearly, this is just an attempt to stall because they know that I have something on them. I have another court hearing in April, which she said is postponing the inevitable because she alleges I owe the debt, without proof. I was able to furnish evidence that no one in my household receive paperwork (proof of debt or proper service) as appropriate, and, that I recently had the only adult in my household served with separation paperwork and I showed her the picture and his license, that my process server used. She then tried to state that my divorce service was their service. I said no look at the case number, it is different and I'm only bringing this to show you that my process server was able to successfully serve the only adult in my household, and what he looks like for your reference. The lawyer does not seem to be very experienced in FCRA laws, by telling me the things that she said. For these reasons, I asked her to go to the judge and vacate the Judgment request. She said that she was not going to do that that the most she could do was give me a continuance. I have every intent to ask the judge to dismiss their case and not entering the Judgment based on their violations of the law. read more