Cancel

    Search

    Mediation Northwest

    5.0 (4 reviews)
    Closed 9:00 am - 4:30 pm

    Get information

    You can now request a consultation from this business directly from Yelp

    Mediation Northwest Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Mediation Northwest

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    1 year ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 1
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Mediation Northwest

    Hutchinson Cox

    Hutchinson Cox

    1.0
    (3 reviews)

    Hello, I have hired Mr. William (Liam) H. Sherlock for a property easement case in 2022. He…read morehandled it so poorly, I filed a formal complaint with the Oregon State Bar Association and kept my opinion to myself until the case was closed. Below is an excerpt from the closing letter. Oregon State Bar State Professional Responsibility Board Case No. 24-253 - William Hugh Sherlock, June 30, 2026 Dear Mr. Sherlock: The State Professional Responsibility Board considered the above-referenced matter and directed me to advise you of its opinion that your conduct did not comply with the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), specifically RPC 1.4(a) [duty to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information], and RPC 1.4(b) [duty to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation]. During your representation of Mr. J, a supplemental judgment for costs was entered against him, naming him and his wife as debtors. You were served with the judgment, but did not transmit a copy to Mr. J or tell him about it. He did not learn about the judgment until almost four months later when a title company informed him about it during a property transaction. Entry of a judgment against a client is the kind of information that needs to be promptly shared with the client to keep the client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and permit the client to make informed decisions about the representation. Further, in many situations such as this one, the lawyer has the responsibility to initiate communication with his client, even if the client has not asked for a status update. In re Graeff, 368 Or 18, 25, 485 P3d258 (2021); (citing In re Groom, 350 Or 113, 124, 249 P3d 976 (2011)). It has been determined that no formal disciplinary proceedings will be instituted against you, but that the matter will be concluded with this letter of admonition. You are urged to consider this matter when faced with similar circumstances in the future. Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Counsel Sherlock is a poor communicator and kept information from a client regarding the representation.

    Wendy was nice enough to go on vacation for two weeks. She emailed me from the airport to tell me…read moreso. This was after she spent 5 hours at $380 an hour telling what I already knew. These people have little to no moral value...It seemed to me that she might have been for the other side. Not a good experience.

    Mediation Northwest - mediators - Updated August 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...