I am a parent with 7 calendar years and 12 kid years (three kids) at this school. This school used to be good almost top to bottom, but has fallen on some hard times that I feel obligated to share with the community.
In this writer's opinion, the problems can be traced back to the principal, Paulette Smith. Despite many ombudsman complaints to O.U.S.D., she is still the principal of the school much to the dismay of what appears to be the majority of the parents.
While there are many things people have griped about with respect to Ms. Smith, my focus is on her handling of before/after care this year at the school.
In my opinion, the most important person on an elementary campus for any working parent, like me, is the before/after care provider. Assuming a child spends six years at the school, if there is stability at the position, that person is the one the child will spend more time with than anybody else, by far.
I was approached by the director Joaquin Millers' after school program (Adventure Time), back in November. She told me that it appeared as if the principal had it in for her organization (who had been on campus for 24 years) as well as her personally and was trying to get rid of both her and the organization. For a couple of months, I couldn't believe it. Why would the principal seem to be going after an important and beloved person on campus?! It just made no sense. But over time, it became clear that what the director reported was true. Something was going on and Ms. Smith was unwilling to communicate to the parents about it.
Once it became clear to quite a few parents that Paulette Smith seemed to be unilaterally deciding on the fate of one of the most important aspects of the school - what the kids do after school and who they do it with - a large number of parents in the school reacted and insisted that a committee be formed to figure out what was going on.
I joined that committee. The first time in seven years at the school I became involved in anything more than field trips and fund raising. What a complete and total nightmare that committee was. Not because the committee didn't so some really good things and not because there weren't some good people on it, but because during the four months of the committee, I had to have had direct interactions with Paulette Smith and each one was a total train wreck.
Unlike Ms. Smith's behind-closed-doors way in which she had been going about this process which stressed all of the parents out, the committee was totally open. Paulette Smith was invited to each meeting. She was also cc'd in every email communication as we attempted to be as transparent as possible. Yet, she did not make an appearance until the fifth meeting and her appearance was a calamity.
After the committee had fully surveyed (with great success) the general population in both Spanish and English and was already breaking down the data, she shows up for the first time. She arrived about an hour late, spends only about 10 minutes at the meeting and doesn't ask a single question about the survey. She did only two things. The first thing she did was say to the very diverse committee (stunning almost speechless everyone present), "Well . . . It doesn't look like this committee represents the diversity of the school." Her only other action during her 10 minute visit was to public berate one of the teachers in front of the committee. A teacher who had been donating her time to assist with this process. Her 10 minute visit was simply one of the most unprofessional and offensive things I have seen in my entire adult life. Right on my children's elementary campus!
Then she just got up an left.
My next encounter with Ms. Smith was no less unprofessional. It happened a couple of weeks later when the committee was presenting the results of the survey to the general parent population in the cafeteria. Ms. Smith walks in a few minutes late (about 6:10pm) and announces that she may not be able to stay for the whole meeting because, and I quote, she "has a doctor's appointment." I kid you not. She claimed, in front of about 40 parents, that she had a doctor's appointment in the evening. Even weirder: She ended up staying for the whole meeting after all! The second thing she announced at the beginning of the meeting was that she had had a private meeting earlier that day with a representative of the Latino community who expressed that they felt excluded from the survey. Two things: One, since we had an after care committee, we should have been notified of the meeting. We were not. Second, and much larger, she proved to everybody how she was truly ignoring the entire process. We had translated the survey into Spanish and received several Spanish surveys back. When we told her this, the only thing we got was a blank stare.
Yelp cutting me off. More at www.paulettemustgo.com read more