This seems like an odd site to review a university, but here goes. I'm just finishing up a taught MA at IDS and have really enjoyed it. While they're still not perfect, I do feel that I made the best choice (between East Anglia, SOAS and IDS). I highly recommend it for anyone working in development.
Pros:
- Faculty are incredibly well-versed in their fields and from diverse backgrounds
- Both faculty and students bring a vast amount of field experience that greatly enhances all the courses
- People at the institute are incredibly well-connected, which is great for networking (and helpful for finding jobs after)
- Small classes; with around 120 taught MA students this year, I've gotten MUCH more individual attention than I would have at other schools (like SOAS)
- The teaching area (admin for the teaching program) work VERY hard for the students and are very supportive.
- The courses and fellows really force you to think critically about concepts/issues within the field of development
Cons:
- the primary focus of IDS is not students; fellows must bring in enough funding each year to meet certain targets, which means they are often away from campus and makes it more difficult to meet with them (but certainly nor impossible)
- for UK students, the tuition is the same as for international students, so it may be a more expensive option
- in my course all of the assessments were based on anonymized term papers; marks can vary depending on who grades them
- on the taught MA there's isn't much time to do fieldwork; it can be done (I know people who have), but you must really coordinate this at least mid-way through your MA. read more