Mr. Robert wilosn was my first choice for my first and hopefully last work comp case and Robert…read moreWilson would be my choice again if I ever had the same issue him and his team go beyond there duty to make sure u get what u deserve it thanks rover Wilson for everything

I got hurt at work and the comp adjuster wouldn't return calls while I was in pain. I had nobody. I…read morecalled Robert Wilson and they abided by my case. I was able to rest at night knowing they had my back. Ultimately, I got the rehab I needed, and returned to work. Robert Wilsons people helped me very much to negotiate with the less than helpful system. I'll forever be grateful.

After being served a summons for a debt that wasn't mine, I contacted John Goolsby for a…read moreconsultation. He explained how to file an answer to prevent a default judgement, and how to navigate the discovery process to prove that I didn't owe any money. Every question I had was answered promptly, either by email, or on the phone. This is the best experience I've ever had with an attorney.

I had a very positive experience with this firm throughout my Legionnaires' case. Raymond…read moreTrueblood and his team never gave up on me. They remained committed, persistent, and dedicated to getting the best possible outcome. Going through a case like this can be incredibly stressful, but knowing they continued to fight for me and never gave up made a huge difference. I truly appreciate all of their hard work, patience, and determination. I would absolutely recommend them to anyone looking for a legal team that will stand by you and keep fighting, no matter how long it takes. Thank you!!!!! They are an unstoppable force.

I can't say enough about David Coyle and his team at Pritzker Hageman and how pleased I am with the…read moreexperience. Everyone was so committed, responsive, friendly and helpful throughout the whole process. They put so much time and energy into my case, I felt like I was their one and only client. They were knowledgeable about cases like mine and navigated through it with ease. I always felt as though they were my partner in this and consulted me through every decision. David was open and upfront about all costs and helpful in my understanding of how cases like this work. He gave his honest opinion and always had my best interests at heart. I've never been through something like this before and am so grateful I had such a knowledgeable, helpful team to support me. I wholeheartedly trust their negotiation skills and knowledge of cases like this. Thank you so much! I give a huge recommendation of David and his team! Sincerely, Kristin Quinn

Samuel Edmunds is an excellent criminal defense attorney. Professional, knowledgeable, and…read moregenuinely cared about my case. Communication was great, and I always felt like I was in good hands. Highly recommend.

Knowledgeable, professional, and easy to work with. They walked me through the entire process and…read moreanswered all of my questions.

RUDE, INSENSITIVE, SELF-ABSORBED…read more After I gave a case summary, Bowden Cyr law firm referred me to Bob Bennett of Gaskins Bennett Birrell Schupp. I left message for Bennett on 6/20/17 and asked him to call me. Later in day, I received call from self-identified law partner Paul Dworak who agreed to assist me. After explaining that I sought a plaintiff's attorney for personal injury, and providing a brief but detailed case summary, Dworak said, curtly, that his law firm wouldn't represent my case. I asked if he could provide guidance on who might, or what type of lawyer would handle my case. Dworak said he wouldn't, then abruptly disconnected the phone - after 2 minutes. Startled, I left another message for Bennett, explaining my disappointment and asking him to call me. He eventually did, but not to assist me or to apologize for Dworak's rudeness. Instead, he reinforced it by saying he had "no interest in hearing my case" and that he would provide no guidance, not even general information, unless I was his client. Bennett then disconnected the phone - after 2 1/2 minutes and before I could explain my concern. I invite you to empower yourself with this knowledge by questioning whether this law firm genuinely cares about helping legal victims during a crisis.

Really a great legal team of personal injury attorneys. They possess the legal acumen and know-how…read moreof the Minneapolis legal system to position you for the maximum amount of success. Their legal prowess coupled with their compassionate counsel makes for a great experience and relieves client's of the stress of what can be a difficult situation. Because they understand the challenges that injured victims must endure, (while they attempt to make a full and healthy recovery) Gaskins Bennett Birrell Schupp work tirelessly to achieve positive resolutions for each client. As such, they have been incredibly successful in securing millions of dollars for injured clients and pleasing clients along the way, including other practice areas as well such as criminal defense. But, if you are seeking aggressive representation for your injury case and would like the added bonus of working with an incredibly successful team, then the attorneys at Gaskins Bennett Birrell Schupp are the right fit for you.

I have known Scott Anderson as a fellow attorney and a friend for over 30 years and he is the best…read moreof both. As an attorney I appreciate his ability to work with a wide variety of clients giving each and every one of them the full benefit of his thorough understanding of the complexities of the law while treating them with respect. Did I mention his results are among the best I have ever seen? His friendship is a treasure to me which has helped me through difficult times without wavering and in the good times we share laughter and more cribbage games than I can count. Speaking of counting, you can always always count on Scott to be there for you!!! John G Ganley Attorney at Law

Scott Anderson did a excellent job representing me! He was very professional and has a lot of…read moreknowledge in his field. This is the third time that I have used his service. He is very personable and I was very comfortable working with him. I would highly recommend Scott Anderson!

Very wonderful, fantastic ,thank you again for your hard work that you did for me greatly deservingread more

I contacted Fields Law regarding a potential Hartford LTD/ERISA disability appeal. Before signing a…read morerepresentation agreement, I asked for written clarification about practical issues involving LTD, SSDI, unemployment benefits, possible return-to-work decisions, closed-period/back-benefits strategy, litigation obligations, and possible fee exposure. After a follow-up phone call with a firm representative, I decided not to proceed. In my opinion, the tone of the call came across as dismissive, condescending, impatient, and unnecessarily defensive. One specific concern was that my final clarification questions were characterized on the call as "another 20 questions," even though my understanding was that I had sent a focused list of approximately 10 practical questions before signing. That characterization felt exaggerated and dismissive to me. I also did not feel comfortable being encouraged to sign the representation agreement first and discuss certain concerns afterward. For me, that was a major red flag. Before signing any legal agreement involving sensitive medical records, disability benefits, SSDI, unemployment, and possible litigation, I need clear written answers and a communication style that feels respectful and aligned. I did not sign the agreement and chose to seek other counsel.

I am so impressed with Baillon Thome Jozwiak & Wanta because of their track record of winning…read morecases, and the kind of cases they take on. They are a law firm that are for the people and they really want to help people that have been wronged by their employers or wronged by dishonest businesses. I also have known one of the lawyers for almost 20 years, and have met his partners and most of his colleagues. They are all really honest, kind, and caring people who genuinely want to help those in need. And at the same time they are all extremely intelligent and passionate about the work that they do. I have also visited their offices many times. The work environment is very positive with a great energy. As a guest, I always feel very welcomed into their offices from the moment I arrive at reception. The office as a whole (interns, assistants, receptionist and lawyers) are all treated as valuable members of a team, which says so much about a company. Baillon, Thome, Jozwiak, Wanta and their team are are amazing lawyers and do their best to help every client. I encourage you to read the "not recommended" Yelp reviews from actual clients, who had never written a Yelp review, but were motivated to do so because of the great services they received. These reviews are very informative about the service and experience you can expect from Baillon Thome Jozwiak and Wanta.

Wanta Thome wasted a great deal of my time, and I understand they have great reviews - so I don't…read moretake putting a 1 star lightly because I appreciate good business. *** BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE - THEY DEMAND 40% CONTINGENCEY FEE FOR PRE-LITIGATION WHICH IS HIGHER THAN USUAL, AND IT GETS WORSE*** I was referred by AI which maybe was my first mistake - but the website looked legitimate and the language seemed to match what I was looking for. I was on the website, and, without acting - a calendar popped up. I was strong-armed into booking an appointment with Carla the intake Lead. Well I book it, but then in the morning Carla e-mails me and tells me she's kicking it down to an entry level intake employee - which I resisted because my case is complex and I wanted someone with experience. Well I didn't get my way, the firm insisted that I get a greenhorn. The new intake person ended up getting fired or quit, but not before wasting my time. The first call was a standard 25 minutes and I submitted a timeline for her as well. 6 days later I get a text saying "Since you're not fired, we can't represent you, but reach out to us immediately if you DO get fired." Those were exactly the terms of rejecting me and leaving the door open. Well a few weeks later my employer ramps up the shenanigans threatening to fire me, then finally does - so I reach back out as instructed. The file is re-opened at Wanta, I'm told GREAT NEWS the attorney is taking a look! Then I had an attorney Kristan call me for another intake. I took the time to send her a detailed updated timeline. She called back with a retainer offer on another day and asked me to open it on the phone. I questioned the high fee and the fact that Wanta Thome will NOT coordinate with EEOC or NLRB inquiries/charges. Compared to what the website says, this seems to make no sense for an employee who did diligence before getting fired who already wants to use those agencies to help out his co-workers and himself. What's disturbing is the amount of wasted time. I TOLD THEM RIGHT AWAY ON THE PHONE AND IN MY TIMELINE THAT I HAVE AN NLRB CHARGE AND EEOC INQUIRY!!! IT TOOK THEM 45 DAYS TO REALIZE IT. I could have been told that initially, it could have been listed on the website in some form. Nobody on the planet it my situation would read the website and be led to believe anything otherwise. The intake process was wonky. Kristen on multiple phone calls assumed I was in Minnesota WHEN I CLEARLY AM IN CHICAGO and corrected her multiple times. They're just not paying full attention. ALSO she said She'd have to ask the partners about the EEOC/NLRB clause in the contract - she said she can't speak with them for 5 days because they're "away" -- I'm sorry, You have a huge law firm in multiple states - and the top 2 partners are going to be off the radar for a week? Do they meditate in the far east? That makes no sense. I respect any attorney's decision to decline a case for whatever reason - but at no point was I led to believe anything other than WANTA THOME IS THE PERFECT FIRM TO REPRESENT ME. I knew it was a wonky process but I told myself - as long as I get retained and they can help me - it'll be worth it. I was wrong. They offered to retain me - and all I said was "hey - do they mind doing something that their website makes it seem like they would totally do?" Advice to the firm - don't put Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, Discrimination on your website if you're not going to coordinate with NLRB or EEOC. Just put in big letters at the top "WE WANT TO SEND A LETTER FOR A HIGH FEE AND IF IT DOESNT WORK WE'RE BACKING OUT." A severe waste of my time - it's not OK - I'll never get it back. They don't really pay attention. I'm not sure what types of cases these reviews come or if they're incentivezed to send them in - but for the sake of helping people who need help - if you see any of these warning signs, consider going somewhere else. IM SO GLAD I DIDNT SIGN THAT RETAINER WITHOUT FIGHTING FOR A SENSIBLE CONTRACT. Change your website