1. GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution

0

Charlotte, NC

Cancel

Open app

Search

GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution

3.0 (2 reviews)
Closed • 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Services - GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution

Business litigation

Consumer litigation

Employment litigation

GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution Photos

You might also consider

More like GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution

Recommended Reviews - GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution

Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
Yelp app icon
Browse more easily on the app
Review Feed Illustration

10 months ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

1 year ago

Helpful 1
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

Ask the Community - GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution

Verify this business for free

Get access to customer & competitor insights.

Verify this business

Burr & Forman - False mileage

Burr & Forman

(1 review)

Uptown

I am documenting my experience after my 2020 Chevrolet Spark was repossessed through Burr &…read moreForman's client, Santander Consumer USA. Despite repeated written requests (July-September 2025), I never received a payoff statement or an opportunity to retrieve my personal belongings. -Brandon Batchelor The notices they relied on included a recycled 'right to cure' letter originally sent to my Florida address in 2021 -- but then later re-used in 2025 as if current, even though I have continuously resided in Florida and maintained registration and insurance there. Their sworn affidavit also stated 'insurance not verified,' yet I had valid, active coverage with State Farm at all times. In addition, their valuation documents inflated my vehicle's mileage at 65,910, when my dated dashboard photo from July 12, 2025 shows only 46,338 miles. That is a discrepancy of nearly 20,000 miles. A notice claimed the vehicle would be sold 'on or after 9/3/2025,' but as of October 2, 2025, the Florida DMV still shows the title as ACTIVE in my name. Regulators are now involved: NC Attorney General (File No. CP-25-16490), CFPB (Case No. 250818-23268585), and the BBB closed my complaint as 'unresolved' after the company failed to address these issues. This review is based solely on my own experience, supported by documents, photos, and regulator case numbers. Anyone dealing with this firm or their client should independently verify every detail.

From the owner: For more than a century, Burr & Forman's experienced legal team has served clients at the…read moreintersection of business and government. With particular industry strengths in the financial institutions, manufacturing, health care, and food and beverage sectors, our attorneys draw from diverse backgrounds and experience to serve as trusted business advisors and legal counsel to help clients achieve their goals. Our firm's century-strong success is credited to our attorneys' forward-thinking approach to crafting innovative solutions for the challenging situations faced by our clients.

Sodoma Law - Nicole Sodoma

Sodoma Law

(8 reviews)

Uptown, Third Ward

I have worked with David Simmons at Sodoma Law on divorce, domestic violence protective order, and…read morechild support cases and highly recommend his counsel. David is professional and thorough, and has helped me navigate several technical and complex legal issues in negotiations and in court. He has also reviewed documents from an attorney I hired prior to him, and helped me navigate the negative consequences of a poorly drafted separation agreement. In addition to his technical expertise, David has taken the time and care to really understand me and my family so that he keeps our core values and priorities in mind at all times. He does a great job explaining all of my options to me, giving me his recommendation, then giving me room to process and make a decision. I know that I will have his full support no matter which route I decide to take, and that he will always advocate for me. I have felt truly understood and cared for, and that I have sound, accurate legal advice whenever I need it.

Sodoma Law advertises itself as a firm that provides strategic guidance, strong advocacy, and…read moreexceptional communication in complex family‑law matters. After years of representation and substantial fees, my experience did not match what they promote. I retained Sodoma Law for an interstate child‑support matter. My case proceeded all the way through a trial, where it was confirmed that my child support should increase from $98 a month to $865 a month, along with arrears. After years of litigation, preparation, and expense, this outcome should have been the resolution of my case. Instead, the most serious failure occurred afterward: my child‑support modification was ultimately **dismissed for lack of subject‑matter jurisdiction**. Because the matter involved UIFSA and an out‑of‑state order, a proper jurisdictional analysis should have been done at the very beginning--long before trial, long before years of litigation, and long before tens of thousands of dollars were spent. Instead, I pursued a modification North Carolina could not legally decide. At no point during those years did anyone at the firm communicate that jurisdiction was uncertain, that the modification might not stick, or that there was any risk the court lacked authority to decide the case. There was no warning, no strategic discussion, and no indication that the entire effort could collapse. I only learned of the jurisdictional problem when the court dismissed the motion outright. This was especially devastating because the trial outcome had already established a significantly higher support amount and arrears. None of that could be finalized because the jurisdictional foundation was never properly addressed. Sodoma Law also promotes strong communication and client support, but my experience was the opposite. Shortly before important proceedings, the firm moved to withdraw and stated in their own motion that I should not expect a continuance despite being left without counsel. They will leave you high and dry without any concern. I also discovered that my client file was incomplete. Only after I questioned it did the firm acknowledge that documents had been "inadvertently not copied over" and then added additional materials. For a firm that advertises meticulous case management, this was troubling. Most concerning of all, when I raised fee‑related disputes connected to the jurisdictional error, *he firm simply stopped responding. Navigating the consequences of their mistake became a long, difficult, and unnecessarily burdensome process--one I had to manage alone, despite the substantial fees I had already paid. For a firm that markets itself as client‑focused and communicative, refusing to address fee disputes tied directly to their own error was deeply disappointing. If you are considering Sodoma Law, I strongly recommend not to.

GS Litigation Swift Dispute Resolution - general_litigation - Updated October 2026

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...