I'm not too happy with this lawyer....a few years ago I was his first case in landlord tenant court and it wasn't because I was being evicted but because the shady asst mgr of The Pines Apt complex April, was trying to bilk me for over $3k! She wouldn't take my current months rent until I paid the outrageous amount she claimed I owed. People if my rent is $680mo total how can I be allowed to still live there if I owed $3,538.00! Do the math, 3 months of my rent would be $2,040 and if I was that far behind would've been evicted long before going to court! Even when Mr Greenblatt saw the amount in question his jaw dropped. So after much debate and some very clever back peddling by April... it was agreed that I'd pay the month rent and the security deposit would be used to pay for any outstanding balance she claimed I owed then I would vacate the premises and "promise not to show legal cause" meaning I wouldn't sue their A**! Little did I know that she was trying to get the money from me because the property was being bought by another company and she was try to tie up loose ends so to speak. So here's my issue with Mr Greenblatt...I followed the agreement made that day in court, paid up & moved out so WHY are there collection notices on my credit reports for not only the new property owners but for the previous owners as well?!? This also shows up as me having 2 evictions on a background check which was done when I applied for a new apartment I need in order to relocate for work. Of course, I appreciate the realtor I'm dealing with as she's waiting for me to clear up any confusion causing these issues but I don't appreciate Mr Greenblatt for NOT following through on the matter by notifying the previous owners that the new legal counsel had made the financial corrections and settled the matter in court or checking to ensure that the new property owners had stuck to the agreement, applied all finances to the correct debt, and had it noted on my file that I left WILLINGLY and was NOT EVICTED! Seeing how they didn't honor the agreement, I'm thinking "all bets are off" and I'm free to go right ahead and "show legal cause" meaning I'll be seeing Mr Greenblatt in court again only this time it'll be civil court and he'll be defending a property that already has several legal "issues" attached to it. Good luck! read more