According to the City and County of San Francisco's DataSF, the Financial District extends south of Market Street, all the way to Howard Street at some points. As such, it is the only "neighborhood" (and I use the air quotes liberally and intentionally, and I'd add the Millennial zoom if this were a video review and I were a Millennial) other than SOMA that is immediately south of Market Street between Van Ness Avenue and the bay. How do you feel about this? About the FiDi extending south of Market Street?
How you answer that question will tell me what kind of San Franciscan or would-be San Franciscan you are. For example, do you believe neighborhoods have exclusive boundaries, or are there certain parts of land that are simultaneously in two or more neighborhoods at the same time? And for the record, I'm not talking about sub-neighborhoods. Obviously, the Inner Richmond and the Outer Richmond are both part of the larger Richmond District, but if you consider Parkside a different neighborhood from, rather than a sub-neighborhood of, the Outer Sunset--and that's a big if--is there a distinct boundary between the Outer Sunset and Parkside, or is there a shared zone, like those border streets in some residential-parking-permit areas where people who hold different permits can park in the same spots?
For me, the Financial District does cross Market Street, and that area where it crosses Market is its alone; SOMA doesn't extend to the bay in my mind, although it used to, before I lived here. So both Montgomery and New Montgomery are in the Financial District.
It's kind of a shell of its old busy self these days, and I'm sure that many of the restaurants that I like and want to love here are now closed--although I'm too scared to confirm. That's sad, because the south-of-Market portion of the Financial District was always the key to the balancing act. If Montgomery Street is Mars, then New Montgomery Street is Venus. The world-devouring financial efficiency of the capitalists north of Market Street--except when it comes to the super inefficient and crony-factory financialization of the economy--is somehow softened or at least pig-lipsticked by the presence of the restaurants and bars and gyms of after-hours work work, which financial and tech workers (a) want to do, (b) and/or are expected to do, and/or (c) are expected to want to do. Nope, there's no work-life balance, because your work is your life, and your life should be ever more devoted to your work. You should incorporate your friends and your family into your work. You should spend your time talking to them about your work. Your employer wants you to be happy working, because that means you'll work more, and the more you work when you're earning a salary, the less per hour your employer is paying you.
So stop exploiting yourself.
I say all of this with the utmost respect for things and people and processes I don't understand. I used to proctor final exams for USF, and for a while, some of those shifts were at USF's Downtown Campus, which is at the very southeast corner of the Financial District. As a proctor, my job was to administer the tests and make sure people people didn't cheat. Some of those classrooms had views of people in their open-floorplan offices at standing desks, and I wondered at all this activity long past five p.m. Were the ones still in the offices at the end of the exams around nine p.m. working because they had fallen behind? Because they didn't want to attend the optiatory happy hours with their supervisors and their "teammates"? What are those lonely souls doing now? Or were most of them never lonely or overworked, and was I simply projecting my fears and frustrations onto them?
I think about this stuff when I'm in the Financial District. And I think about the fact that there are Walgreens locations on the south side of Market Street in the Financial District that have fresh bananas every day. Every day! How do they know exactly how many people will buy each day so that they're never bad? read more