1. Eierman & Schulken

0

East Hampton, NY

Cancel

Open app

Search

Eierman & Schulken

5.0 (2 reviews)
Closed • 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Services - Eierman & Schulken

Accountants

Audit and conflict resolution support

Current year tax preparation and filing

Eierman & Schulken Photos

You might also consider

Recommended Reviews - Eierman & Schulken

Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
Yelp app icon
Browse more easily on the app
Review Feed Illustration

4 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

5 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

You might also consider

Verify this business for free

Get access to customer & competitor insights.

Verify this business

Premier - Accounting Tax & Business

Premier - Accounting Tax & Business

(26 reviews)

Bedford Stuyvesant

I got my taxes done by Adam Gajta and he was amazing! He was very patient and understanding with…read moreme, and wanted to make sure I got the best service. I had my taxes done last year by someone else and they made major errors, Adam was willing to take the time and go over and fix those. I genuinely feel like he wanted the best for me and that's why I will continue to come back to him for my taxes. If you aren't certain where to get your taxes done, I definitely recommend getting them done by Adam! He will make sure you get the best outcome possible! Keep up the good work!

Thank you for your response. Unfortunately, your reply reinforces the very concern raised in my…read morereview rather than addressing it. Your response is also very similar to responses I have seen from your firm to other clients who have described concerns with the level of service, communication, and support they received. Rather than addressing the underlying feedback, the response appears focused on defending the firm's position. Regarding the notice itself, I think it is important not to minimize what occurred based solely on the title of the document. Whether your firm characterizes it as a New York State Request for Information rather than an "audit," it was a tax-authority inquiry concerning my tax filing that required documentation and a response. The distinction in terminology does not change the fact that I contacted the tax professional who prepared my return because I needed guidance and assistance responding to that inquiry. As for my records, they were ultimately provided, but only after multiple calls to your office followed by an email advising that the documents needed to be released by a specific date and time. So while you can accurately state that the records were eventually delivered, that does not address the communication and service issues that led to the escalation in the first place. More importantly, the issue regarding depreciation was not simply that I later became interested in obtaining a depreciation schedule. During the engagement, I was not clearly advised that this documentation was necessary to properly establish the depreciable basis or appropriately allocate the property between land and building. As the tax professional engaged to prepare my return, I expected your firm to request the information necessary to properly prepare the return and to guide me through those requirements. That did not occur. That is the feedback I believe your firm should take from this experience. Rather than focusing on defending the wording of a review or distinguishing between an audit and a request for information, I would encourage the firm to use this feedback to improve clarity, communication, documentation requests, and client education during the engagement. Those are the issues that ultimately matter to the client.

Eierman & Schulken - accountants - Updated November 2026

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...