1. Edge General Contracting

0

Lake Havasu City, AZ

Cancel

Open app

Search

Edge General Contracting

3.7 (6 reviews)
Closed • Closed

Services - Edge General Contracting

Balcony addition

Deck construction

Edge General Contracting Photos

You might also consider

Recommended Reviews - Edge General Contracting

Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
Yelp app icon
Browse more easily on the app
Review Feed Illustration

1 month ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

3 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 1
Oh no 0

2 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 1
Oh no 0

3 years ago

Helpful 2
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

6 years ago

Business owner information

Photo of Shane K.

Shane K.

Helpful 1
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

7 years ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 1
Love this 1
Oh no 0

Ask the Community - Edge General Contracting

You might also consider

Verify this business for free

People searched for General Contractors 760 times last month within 25 miles of this business.

Verify this business

ACE Design Drafting

ACE Design Drafting

(9 reviews)

The owner and everybody else that works at this place I called them out of the blue for somebody…read morecause I'm a contractor in California that was looking for an architect Lake Havasu. The guy was so nice and so reasonably priced I couldn't believe it.

My husband and I met with ACE Design and Drafting (ACE) in August 2023 to review the drawings we…read morehad prepared and conduct an interview regarding skills, experience, and process in preparing the plans. As a result of the interview, in August 2023 we entered into an agreement for ACE to prepare building ready plans for our project. The estimate to complete the plans was 3 months. Although our experience with ACE began as amiable, it slowly deteriorated to less than satisfactory. Our verbal phone communication and interaction with ACE soured, and we were no longer able to communicate/interact with ACE verbally over the phone, only by email. Unfortunately, communication with ACE through email did not improve. Our communication issues or lack of communication with and from ACE caused a considerable delay of the submittal of our plans to the County. They were not able to be submitted to the County for initial review until February 2024, nearly six (6) months after entering into the agreement with ACE. We experienced unfavorable interactions with ACE which are noted below. * ACE misplaced the drawings we provided. As we did not have a second copy of the drawings (our mistake), this delayed ACE in preparing the plans. We were in California, so it was necessary to travel to Lake Havasu City, Arizona and assist ACE in locating the drawings in the office. * The plans were submitted to Mohave County (County) for review and the County noted various corrections/redlines were required. ACE was contacted by letter which detailed the redlines needed for the house and shop. Per the County, ACE did not make all the required corrections/redlines (although our agreement states required corrections will be made when ordered by the County). The County representative was very helpful and was able to make the remaining required corrections/redlines as noted below. House - Correction requested - Wall bracing for this structure does not meet minimum of code. Please revise. (Ref. IRC 2018 R602.10) * This was as a result of stucco vs metal siding. The correction from wording of stucco to metal siding was noted on the plans, however, the legend which showed wall board was being used was incorrect as was the use of the wall board legend icon (a 3 in a triangle) noted around the exterior of the structure. As our home would have metal siding, wall board is not required. However, sheathing (a 2 in a triangle) is required on the entire exterior of structure. The County made the correction by striking through the "wall board" legend icon and replacing in red ink the "sheathing" legend icon. Shop - Correction requested - Header over garage door fails loading. Please revise. (Ref. IRC 2018 R301.1) * The plans show a correction of a "4x12 header"; however, in this situation a 6x12 header was required. The County made the correction by striking through "4x12 header" and replacing in red ink "6x12 header".

Graphic Concepts - Our house, designed by Graphic Concepts

Graphic Concepts

(4 reviews)

We had a great experience with Graphic Concepts! Brian was able to meet with us on short notice…read moreso we could begin a fence project that needed engineered plans with the County. Super nice guy, helped us clarify the details before handing off to the Engineer. Turn around time was quick and results are what we needed!! Can't thank them enough!!

I saw Brian McLauphlins response which has led me to the point of needing to respond to his…read morecomplete and utter garbage. Graphic concepts hung 33k lbs of hss beam off of one side of ibeam with 24"x24" footings and tells me it will not fail. He expects his engineer to rubber stamp the work he has done. Our Structural engineer reviewed and failed the design, provided me with a letter saying the structure would fail. I decided not to take him to court and not to seek 100% of the funds which we paid him over a two year period. He was provided every opportunity to correct his design. At the end we paid 6 times what this company was asking for. I scratched his entire structural design and asked a reputable company to redo everything to obtain a design which would not fail... I would not hire them to do a design even for my dog's house! I don't believe a word the guy has to say. Get your Cadd files before you make any payments to him so you don't have to start from scratch. Save yourself the massive headache and go with someone which is reputable. Building and safety can provide you with names of designers which don't have this issue.

Edge General Contracting - contractors - Updated November 2026

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...