Colin did real estate refinancing for me. Communication and advice was good …read more Transaction went smoothly. Thanks

Hostile, aggressive didnt show up for case conference , kept yelling at me and stupidly asked me to…read moretake off my shoes when entering his apartment.

To Joe Campisi and his amazing team at Campisi Law:…read more There are few life events that are as monumentally stressful, physically and emotionally painful as being in a catastrophic car accident. But, thanks to the amazing and compassionate team at Campisi Law, my husband Eric and I have successfully achieved fair settlements from both our Insurance company and the other driver's insurance company after being in a head on collision in 2014. My injuries were catastrophic and life altering, including a brain injury, broken bones and multiple internal organ injuries. Joe and the Campisi team worked hard to ensure that from the beginning, I had the financial means to afford the necessary and considerable medical and home supports as I continued the recovery process. They dealt with all communications from the insurance companies and never allowed them to push back or harass me in any way. Although the insurance companies discounted the stacks of medical evidence presented and tried every tactic they could to intimidate and undermine our case, Joe dealt with them every step of the way and was able to get the best possible settlements for us. At all times, Joe Campisi had our best interests at heart. He and his amazing law clerks kept in regular contact with updates and were quick respond to our questions and concerns. We are forever grateful for the huge amount of time and attention that Joe and his team put toward our case. Aside from the regular contact and updates on our case, I know that there was constant work being done on our behalf behind the scenes. This is not a lawyers office that rests on their laurels. They had vast and detailed knowledge about my injuries and how they affected all aspects of my life and have worked tirelessly to ensure that the settlements are enough to support my ongoing medical therapies and home supports. To anyone reading this testimonial: The most important decision you must make after a devastating accident is to hire the best possible personal injury law firm to navigate the complex and intimidating process of winning your settlement. Don't choose on basis cheaper fees or fancy television commercials; rather, base your choice on the outstanding record of achievements and testimonials that people like me are making for Campisi Law. It's your bottom line that is at stake, and Campisi Law makes that their mission. I knew that from the moment that Joe Campisi came to my home to explain how he was going to help us that we were in the best possible hands. Joe Campisi and Associates, you have been a great blessing and we will be forever grateful for what you have accomplished for us. Eric and I are looking forward to hosting a lunch for you and your team to celebrate the outcome of a hard fought battle.

I will say " Imtiaz is an awesome lawyer he has great attitude , devotion and skill in his…read moreprofession in this young age " I found him best lawyer in my 6 years accident case with Campisi.

I can't recommend Mr. Brown highly enough. His exceptional expertise kept my son away from jail…read moretoday. His communication throughout the process was always clear, timely, and informative. For anyone seeking a lawyer who combines profound legal knowledge with outstanding client care, Edmond Brown and his team are the best choice. Thank you again and again Mr. Brown Felix

WILLIAM JAKSA HELPED SAVE MY BROTHER IN CRIMINAL COURT…read more Sometimes life is not fair, this case was a perfect example. We had a different lawyer previously and that person did nothing. **William Jaksa accepted the case and everything changed swiftly. This is a THANK YOU from my brother and a justified review for Mr. Jaksa: "I would like to thank Mr. Jaksa and associates for all their hard work concerning my case. Mr. Jaksa's reputation as a gold standard for lawyers is well deserved. He has given me another chance at life. Everything was explained to me in a way I could understand, my input was assessed and valued, I was properly prepared for a trial and my family's best interests were looked after during the court proceedings. With all the stresses associated with being charged, incarcerated and standing before the courts, I felt more at ease knowing my case was being properly handled. I have learned it is not always what happens in the court room but the processes going on in the background: work done in the office, the streets, the meetings in the judges chambers, all the way to the courtroom. Thank you Mr. Jaksa for your due diligence, your compassion and most of all your knowledge." Sincerely Rick G

I was charged with DUI. I hired SEDEROFF and Associates and…read morethe team helped me negotiate a great outcome. Thanks Darren for helping me get a great result.

Everything all of the sudden became a hell to me as getting charged with a big crime I did not…read morecommit, there was no other way but turning to my lawyer and Darren showed up for me with his diligent legal skills. As time goes by in and out of Detention Centre, I saw nothing but empty walls and was too anxious to think about not being able to see my family and to see overwhelmed myself. Darren made everything so easier for my hell situations and now got all my charges dropped. I can't ever forget this day. S. H. Jun

Mike really helped me out with sensitive problem I was having. He was approachable, understanding…read moreand very professional. I have already recommended him to others who are in need of top notch legal defense.

Confused? I was convicted of a second Impaired charge…read morealthough my subsequent DUI occurred 12 years previous; so this charge should be considered a first defence. That is how the MTO treated it. My Findlay convinced the courts to treat as second! District Attorney envy? Mind blowing!

Sabrina, I am disheartened by your review. I did not excellent work for your husband. The judge…read morefound the police breached your husband's Charter rights but unfortunately she did not exclude it from evidence. He received a significantly reduced sentence because of the letters of reference I organized. You may remember I asked you to read your letter to the judge in court. I sent you a copy of the reasons where the judge wrote about what your husband's family and friends said about him. Personal letters and detailed submissions by counsel are always better than a sterile report from a government paid social worker. The reason I could not answer all your questions is because you were not the client. Your husband was and I had my solicitor duty of confidentiality with him that he did not waive with respect to you. Your husband obviously disagrees with your assessment of my legal representation because we talk and our friends and he asked you to remove another review you wrote about me. Unfortunately, Yelp does not allow a person to remove a review after it is written. I just want to set the record straight about how much you misconceptions about your husband's case.

"If I could give a negative rating, I would. Sam was my husbands defense lawyer from 2021 to August…read more2023 when the case closed. He lost the case, on many fronts and my husband ended up with a much harsher sentence than he deserved. When we interviewed Sam before retaining him, he was kind, patient, and answered all of our questions. The moment, I sent him the retainer, this all changed. He charged us over $50,000 and to this day I do not have an invoice to explain what this money was used for. He convinced us that he had enough to fight the charge should we chose to do so. We decided to go to trial to fight my husbands charge. For the year leading up to the trial, Sam spoke to my husband briefly, and gave only 2 options for defense. One was not a viable option, and the other was simply to accept guilt. At no point did he explain his defense strategy (which I now know was a pathetic attempt to provide a defense). If we asked questions about his strategy, he would say "do you trust me?", and avoid answering our questions. We decided to trust him and move forward. At my husbands trial, he submitted a statement of facts and spoke for less than 3 min (I timed it). That was it!!!!!!! 3 min!!!!!!!!. Because he didn't prep us for trial, and asked us to "trust him", we had no idea what he was going to say at trial or in this case, NOT going to say. The defense was a joke. The crown ate him up. My husband was found guilty weeks later, and was sentenced to 3 years in prison. Prior to the verdict on Jan 26, 2023 Sam spoke to my husband on the phone a total of 6 times from Dec 14, 2022 - Jan 5, 2023. 5 of those calls were 5min or less. The 6th call was 12min. There was no in person meeting. We met him in person ONCE in the last 2 years. When we called to try and book a meeting prior to the trial, prior to the verdict, and prior to the sentence, he said on multiple occasions, that he'll "talk to us later". He repeatedly, on numerous occasions, brushed us off of the phone by saying that "I only have a few minutes". He told me that it doesn't matter if I meet with you 3 days before the sentence, as "it doesn't matter". 5 weeks before the sentencing date, we had asked him 3 times for a face-to-face meeting, he brushed us off every time. We sent emails asking for basic information that we were entitled to know like: What is the crown asking for in terms of a sentence? What are we asking for in terms of a sentence? How many people can speak at the sentencing? What are the ways in which we can present husband before the court to have the best chance of a lower sentence? What mitigating factors are you presenting? What aggravating factors are there? What credit is husband entitled to for pre-sentence custody? What credit is husband entitled to for harsh custodial conditions? What collateral consequences are you planning to present on behalf of husband? He did NOT answer even one of these questions. Sam did NOT provide adequate council. He did NOT communicate with us in a timely or sufficient manner, and when he did communicate with us, he would say verbatim that "I only have a few minutes". He consistently rushed us off of the phone and would either ignore or blatantly not answer any of our questions. I begged and pleaded with him and sent him numerous emails and text messages to answer my questions. We were left in the dark the whole time. He did not answer my questions. He was the sole cause my stress and anxiety leading up to sentencing that I ended up taking a 3 month leave of absence from work. Sam did not care. Finally, at sentencing, which was all we had left to get a lower sentence, Sam did not guide us AT all. I did my own independent research and spoke to 5 other criminal lawyers, John Howard society, probation officers, anyone that I could think of to help us. Sam told us to get a "few character" references. He never requested a pre-sentence report, which is very common especially for first-time offenders and was probably my husband's best shot at getting a lighter sentence. I asked him multiple times to order a pre-sentence report and he never answered my email once. When I asked him over the phone, he said that he would do a better job at giving background information about my husband than what the presentence report could do. On the day of sentencing, his "background" information consisted of my husbands name (which he mispronounced), his age, stated that he was a first time offender and has a child. He mentioned that he had 3 step-siblings to which the JUDGE HERSELF had to correct him that they are his half-siblings and stating my name which he also got wrong. A pre-sentence report is pages and pages long that go into who the offender actually is, a probation officer would have interviewed me and his family and friends to get a full picture as to my husband is, his upbringing, his character, etc. Sam totally f**ked us! Stay away from this bastard!

Toronto family law attorney Gary Gottlieb recently crowed on Twitter about his "victory" in wining…read more$675,000 in attorney fees for his client after, according to fellow attorney Adam N. Black's Financial Post article, an "epic five year fight over the kids."    Clearly, the true winner is Gary Gottlieb, who ended up with much of the $1.7 million that the case cost. This case is a prime example of what a racket family courts are, with judges in on the criminal collusion   While I don't know the specifics of this case, the pattern of the racket is clear.   Corrupt judges heavy handedly favor corrupt attorneys like Gottlieb, and appoint corrupt "experts" at the attorney's request, all at enormous expense to the parents.   These court appointees work to make sure the cases are not settled too quickly to please and not anger attorneys like Gottlieb, who refer them.   They cover up or minimize abuse in favor of the abusive parent, who not so coincidentally is the wealthier parent, knowing the better parent has no choice but to fight to protect the kids.   They get other "expert" buddies involved to further muddy the waters and prolong the case.   They use a debunked pseudoscience called "parental alienation" to justify reversal of custody, often cutting off all contact between the kids and the better parent, thereby proving themsleves to be the true alienators.   They claim to be acting in the children's best interest, when in truth, it is always about the money and they will engage in all manners of fraud, falsifying of evidence or reports, obstruction, and collusion to make sure the money ends up in their pockets. To cover up their own complicity, the judges leave the better parent without the financial means to mount an appeal, after awarding the abusive parent sole custody.   They have no concern for the life long anxiety and stress caused to the children, who they order to be forcibly taken from their loved ones, home, pet(s), school and friends to go live with a parent who would subject them to such trauma, and to have no further ontact with the people they love and who love them.   Simultaneously, corrupt judges mislead a trusting public, unable to fathom such judicial sadism, corruption and duplicity, to believe that the better parent must have done something wrong to deserve such a punitive ruling, when in truth, no one's divorce should end in such an unjust, life destroying outcome.  In this case, Gottlieb's client didn't ask for $675,000 in attorney fees, Judge Heather McGee took it upon herself to bestow the unjustifiable, one sided order against a poor mother who the judge knew didn't have the money to pay.   Why would the "honorable" judge do this if not to cover up her own fraud and misconduct? Why go to court only to have one's life destroyed in a criminal racket? GOTTLIEB'S PEERS SHOULD HOLD HIM AND MCGEE TO ACCOUNT OR RISK LOSING ALL PUBLIC TRUST IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Until then, avoid courts until the children are too old to be used to pit and extort the parents and until you see unethical, racketeering attorneys, "experts", and judges lose their licenses and removed from the bench. No one should be above the law, least of all a judge or an officer of the court.

I'm very happy with my results mr Hossein Motevalli helped me very much they dropped all my…read morecharges very professional great help thank you