Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Bean Kinney & Korman

    4.2 (5 reviews)
    Closed • Closed

    Services - Bean Kinney & Korman

    Auxiliary legal services

    Real estate law

    Bean Kinney & Korman Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Bean Kinney & Korman

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    7 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    12 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 3
    Oh no 1

    8 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    10 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Bean Kinney & Korman

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    Get access to customer & competitor insights.

    Verify this business

    Federal Title & Escrow Company - Arlington - Reception

    Federal Title & Escrow Company - Arlington

    (4 reviews)

    Clarendon

    We had a great experience working with Luke and his team. They were very responsive to my emails,…read moreand scheduling was very convenient. They provided all the necessary information at the right time and were so organized that, on the day of closing, the entire process was completed in 20 minutes. The Arlington location has garage parking in the building, which they validated after the appointment.

    When my Mortgage Refinance Loan Officer told me I could select my own closing company I started my…read moresearch on Google which led to a Washington Post article on selecting a title company. The article included interviews with senior executives from three companies, including the CEO of Federal Title & Escrow. More research led to other articles, reviews, and ratings for Federal Title and other companies. Federal Title had a large number of 5-star reviews on Redfin, Google, Birdeye, and Yelp. Needless to say, after comparing with other local title companies, I was sold on Federal Title & Escrow. They also had a number of office locations in the D.C. Metro area. I passed my choice on to my Loan Officer and sent an email to Federal Title at 4:54 pm. Within three minutes, Connie Chang from Federal Title replied and copied my Loan Officer. It took off quickly from there. At 5:20 pm the same day I received an email from Evan Habib who would be my settlement coordinator for the mortgage refinance. He included information on the types of documents I would need to review, including the loan terms and links to examples of several other documents. This gave me a good idea of what to expect. At all times I received very quick replies to any questions from both Connie and Evan ensuring as the closing date neared I knew where the closing would be held, and where parking was located (right next to the building and they validate). Having selected the offices nearest my home, Luke Bacigalupo, Settlement Agent, would meet me at that office for final signatures. I arrived at the Arlington location early to be sure I avoided any traffic surprises. They have the entire 12th floor with a beautiful view from the conference room. The gentleman at the front desk was friendly, told me Luke would be there shortly, and showed me where I could get coffee, water, etc. Very comfortable setting. When Luke arrived, as I had already read most of the documents over the previous week or so, the closing went quickly. It had been a number of years since I attended a closing, there seems to be a lot more paperwork now, but we managed to get through it quickly. Luke answered all my questions and gave me options where appropriate. I was very pleased with the entire process and very impressed with the thoroughness and attention to detail Connie, Evan and Luke demonstrated. Yes, I highly recommend Federal Title & Escrow.

    The Employment Law Group - The Employment Law Group building

    The Employment Law Group

    (89 reviews)

    Downtown

    The Employment Law Group (TELG) was recommended to me by a partner at a Washington, D.C. law firm,…read moreand my experience fully justified that endorsement. From my initial consultation with Scott Oswald, the firm's principal, through my work with attorney Kellee Kruse, I was consistently impressed by their professionalism, expertise, and dedication. They took the time to thoroughly evaluate my case and demonstrated a clear commitment to achieving the best possible outcome for my employment situation. Kellee was particularly responsive and communicative, always making herself available to answer questions and keeping me well-informed of developments throughout the process. I highly recommend The Employment Law Group for any employment-related matters, regardless of complexity. Their thoughtful approach and level of service make them a worthwhile investment.

    I paid for a consultation with this firm seeking strategic legal advice regarding an intense…read moreworkplace dispute involving documented manager misconduct and severe retaliation. Unfortunately, the counsel I received from Nicholas Woodfield was incredibly shallow, and his conduct was entirely unprofessional. When discussing an escalation strategy regarding corporate misconduct, the attorney gave me narrow, bare-minimum technical advice regarding harassment definitions, even incorrectly referencing a non-existent "Employment Rights Act of 1964" instead of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. When I tried to interject to let him know I was already fully aware of these basic concepts, he cut me off and said, "Just let me finish." He completely failed to address the broader context of retaliation law, temporal proximity, or the legal leverage a documented paper trail creates against wrongful termination. Furthermore, his analysis completely missed the critical distinction between a narrow statutory lawsuit and corporate governance liability. He failed to see how a meticulously documented paper trail of executive misconduct--such as a CEO manufacturing a fraudulent performance record, prioritizing manual volume over operational utility, and abusing corporate channels to interrogate an employee--creates massive, direct liability for a Board of Directors. Instead of recognizing that a broken internal HR chain and an erratic executive constitute a severe fiduciary and operational risk to an organization, he focused entirely on a retail courtroom vacuum. When discussing presenting my documentation to the Board, he gave a lazy, fear-based warning that the Board could simply turn around and fire me. Yet he completely failed to analyze the other side of that equation: what legal and corporate-governance consequences could arise once the Board was formally placed on notice of documented executive misconduct and then failed to adequately address it. He never walked me through the potential significance of Board knowledge, subsequent retaliation, corporate ratification, negligent retention or supervision, or potential fiduciary-duty implications. Those were precisely the kinds of legal risks and leverage I was paying an employment attorney to identify. What makes this lack of analysis even more appalling is the attorney's own published professional record. His firm highlights his representation of Donna Jackson in a major retaliation case resulting in a restored $650,000 jury verdict, involving adverse employment actions after an employee reported discrimination. His firm also highlights his representation of Matthew Drake in an appellate whistleblower case establishing, under the federal Whistleblower Protection Act, that a whistleblower did not need to prove an actual violation of law where the applicable reasonable-belief standard was satisfied. This attorney had substantial professional experience with both retaliation following internal reporting and the important distinction between proving an underlying legal violation and determining whether a disclosure can nevertheless receive legal protection. Yet he emphasized that the Board could fire me and that the underlying conduct I described was not illegal, without meaningfully analyzing whether my existing or contemplated disclosures could qualify for protection under the laws applicable to my situation. The sophistication reflected in his own published case history was completely absent from the consultation I paid for. To make matters worse, he interrogated me with completely uncalled-for questions like "Why do you think he is acting like this?" and "Why are you working there?"--subtly shifting the burden onto me rather than analyzing the documented facts. He even trivialized documented executive misconduct by reducing it to a personal claim - saying that it seems that my dad and I simply "don't get along." He capped it off saying that I "don't have to work there." I did not pay for a legal consultation to be psychoanalyzed and given excuses for executive misconduct. During our call, I directly told the attorney that he hurt me and was out of line. Instead of taking accountability, he completely dismissed my pain and followed it up with a fake apology. I paid for professional, comprehensive analysis of employee rights and corporate liability, but instead received a complete lack of thoroughness and a total absence of professional empathy. The consultation I had with Mr. Woodfield was a complete waste of time and money. If you are looking for an advocate who will thoroughly analyze your situation and treat you with basic professional respect, look elsewhere.

    Bean Kinney & Korman - legalservices - Updated October 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...