I saw Dr. Passer for the first time yesterday. I feel I 'm a fairly complicated case, but Dr…read more Passer took the time needed to find out what he needed to know to make a diagnosis. He said I have Bipolar Disorder, which is kinda funny because I've been told that before, but never really believed it. Dr. Passer showed me that I do have Bipolar Disorder from a diagnosis book he has. Now I do believe it, even though it's a bummer, at least now I finally have some hope that I can get better. He gave me a prescription and I go back in two weeks. I'm actually excited b/c I think I can get better. Last night and after the first dose of the medicine, I slept better than I have slept in a very long while. That's why I got up today and wanted to post something positive about my experience with Dr. Passer. Thanks Dr. Passer.

I didn't have to wait long to get an appointment. They don't take insurance but I don't have any so…read moreit wasn't a thing. I didn't have to wait to see the dr. He asked if I wanted coffee or water. He said he was sorry for the time I had to wait, which was none. He listened and sometimes I go on and on so that was good. I am already on meds, but he went through and took some away instead of adding more meds to what I already took. That was surprising but it needed to happen. He brought me down to 3 meds. I was on seven. I actually feel better now. Then after one week after taken away 4 meds, he called to check on me to see if I was ok and I told him yes. Afterward, I thought about it and can't think of when any other dr ever called up to check on me. That was pretty neat.

I am writing this because future nurses and families deserve to know the truth about the Louisiana…read moreState Nursing Board and Pine Grove Rehab. Their system is not about protecting patients--it is about control, money, and punishment. Here is my story: I was one semester away from graduating nursing school when my life was turned upside down. I had already gotten sober and provided proof of it--three hair follicle tests I paid for myself and a pre-employment drug screen showing over a year of sobriety. Six weeks after giving birth to my daughter, I underwent a required "fitness for duty" drug screen. Unsurprisingly, fentanyl was in my system--because I had received an epidural during labor. I did the responsible thing: I provided the official anesthesia records from my hospital stay showing exactly what medications were administered. Instead of looking at the medical evidence, the Board and Pine Grove Rehab accused me of being a liar and an addict. They actually said I "used the epidural as cover for street drugs." Then came their outrageous demand: 90 days of inpatient rehab at Pine Grove. That would have meant 90 days away from my 6-week-old baby whom I was breastfeeding. Think about that: forcing a new mother into unnecessary inpatient treatment, cutting her off from her newborn, despite clear medical documentation. I want to make this crystal clear: I did not meet the criteria for Substance Use Disorder in the DSM-5. I was not addicted to anything. I was not dependent on any drug. Every shred of medical and diagnostic evidence supported that. Yet they ignored it all, because profit and punishment came first. This was not about "help." This was about money. Pine Grove benefits from mandatory referrals. The Board benefits by maintaining power and forcing compliance. Nurses like me get caught in the middle, treated as guilty until proven innocent, and pushed into debt and despair. And my story is not unique. Across the country, boards and rehab programs have been exposed for this exact behavior: * CalMatters Report (2024): "California Nurses Say State's Addiction Recovery Program Is a Trap" - documenting how recovery programs tied to licensing boards drive nurses into debt and out of their careers. Read here * AllNurses Forum: Hundreds of nurses describe board-linked rehab programs as corrupt and profit-driven: AllNurses IPN Issues * Reddit Nursing Community: Nurses share feelings of being "defeated" under unnecessary restrictions despite years of sobriety. Reddit Thread This system is designed to break nurses, not support them. It steals careers, destroys financial stability, and labels people forever, even when there is clear proof of innocence. But here's the part they don't want to hear: they did not break me. Despite their efforts, I went back, rebuilt my life, graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Psychology, and am now pursuing my Master's degree. I am succeeding in my career and supporting my family in spite of them, not because of them. The Louisiana State Nursing Board and Pine Grove Rehab should be investigated for their unethical, exploitative practices. They do not help nurses--they harm them. They do not protect the public--they protect their profit. To any nurse facing this system: know that you are not alone, it is not your fault, and you can rise above it

After four months of PEP in 2022--and recheck in 2023--I have strong opinions about the the…read moreprogram. My experience, informed by interactions with scores of other patients and years of ongoing recovery, compels me to speak candidly about PEP's serious shortcomings. The PEP staff lacked both training and supervision. New to recovery, I initially took their word and thought I received expert care. But as I gained exposure to other programs and talked to staff and patients who had passed through PEP before and after me, it became clear that this was not the case. Astonishingly, in a program where half the group faced sex addiction or related boundary issues, there was not a single Certified Sex Addiction Therapist. In one session, therapists badgered a patient to reveal details about his acting out, flagrantly disregarding protocols designed to protect group members from triggers. The foundation of PEP's approach is the multi-page "Treatment Plan," meant to document diagnoses, challenges, and progress. Every week, staff and the attending psychiatrist signed off on these plans. Mine exceeded forty pages, yet when I returned for my recheck and asked senior clinicians about the origins of the scoring system used to rate symptoms and progress, they knew neither the author nor methodology. I later discovered that their own boss had developed the system--years earlier--but staff ignorance of the core treatment document stuns me. My concerns escalated further with the diagnostic process itself. At PEP, nearly every patient get a personality disorder diagnosis near the end of treatment--sometimes in the final hour--leaving many patients blindsided and unable to. In my case, the staff changed my diagnosis multiple times in quick succession, finally sending a written report weeks after I'd left. When I pointed to prior test results and evaluations from highly respected psychologists and psychiatrists, these were dismissed as irrelevant and my resistance used as evidence against me. Post-discharge, I sought five independent professional opinions; over five figures later none collaborated PEP's findings. Experts confirmed my suspicion that diagnoses at PEP were often forced to fit predetermined narratives rather than emerging impartially from the evidence. A major feature of the program was the use of a severity scale from 0 to 4, to quantifying addiction. Despite arriving at PEP with 90 days of sobriety, staff rated me "severe"--a score that ignored my stauts and seemed crafted to support further treatment rather than healing. Even at discharge, my scores remained elevated ignoring their own written standards. This habit of inflating severity extended to almost every case I witnessed, leaving many patients feeling trapped by labels that did not reflect their true condition. The scoring, it seemed, served institutional interests (like insurance reimbursements) more than patient recovery. Ethical violations were not confined to clinical practice; they permeated the culture of PEP. Staff sometimes conspiring with patients to craft diagnoses to suit insurance needs, therapists antagonizing rather than supporting, and patients pitted against one another in contrived "community" confrontations. HIPAA protections were flouted--once, a therapist even accused a patient of infidelity to their spouse without proof (or even telling the accused- their own patient), causing needless harm. Regularly, therapy appointments were cancelled to accommodate insurance meetings, with revenue placed above care. Such priorities call into question whether patient health truly matters at PEP. The environment at PEP felt unsafe. Reports and personal observations pointed to numerous suicide attempts and actual suicides within the program--tragic. Staff conduct was frequently combative, triggering breakdowns and relapses that set back recovery for weeks or months. Mixed-gender programming afforded rampant inappropriate relationships that destabilized the recovery and marriages of vulnerable patients, putting them in jeopardy and often redirecting them to more care in Pine Grove. While the structure at PEP seemed to benefit those few with true personality disorders--three out of the fifty or sixty patients I encountered--almost all others left the program doubting their diagnoses, unable to corroborate them with medical histories or follow-up evaluations. Ultimately, my years of ongoing recovery and continuous contact with other former patients reinforce my belief that PEP operates unethically, provides substandard care, and fosters a dangerous environment. Its methods reflect institutional priorities at the expense of patient well-being. Those seeking help deserve programs that adhere to evidence-based care, uphold ethical standards, and value the dignity and safety of participants. I could not in good conscience recommend PEP and would urge anyone in need to look elsewhere.