Review & Complaint Regarding Joe Porter, PA-C As a well versed individual of medical professionalism with a deep understanding of patient care standards, provider ethics, & the regulatory requirements governing PA's in the state of Ut, I am compelled to document & formally address a significant breach of medical ethics and duty of care committed by Joe Porter, PA-C. This review not only underscores the fundamental failings in his approach to patient assessment & treatment but also highlights his disregard for established Ut medical board guidelines, including patient rights, the duty of care, & professional conduct. Failure in Initial Patient Assessment & Violation of Duty of Care One of the most critical elements of medical practice is the thorough & unbiased assessment of a patient, ensuring that care is based on a comprehensive understanding of symptoms, history, & potential treatment ave. According to UT Admin Code R156-70a (Physician Assistant Practice Act Rule) & the AAPA Guidelines, a PA must conduct a complete & accurate medical evaluation, engage in dialogue with the patient, & utilize clinical judgment based on objective findings rather than assumptions. Joe Porter, PA-C, failed entirely in this most basic requirement of his role. Upon my visit, he did not ask a single question to ascertain the reason for my appointment, nor did he conduct a proper assessment. Instead, he relied solely on a single note entered at the time of registration, without further inquiry, verification, or patient dialogue. This blatant failure to engage in due diligence regarding a patient's presenting complaint violates Utah state medical board standards for proper patient assessment. Furthermore, Utah Code Ann. § 58-70a-501 clearly outlines that a physician assistant must provide care that is consistent with professional standards & guidelines. His approach was in direct violation of patient-centered care, instead relying on preconceived & erroneous assumptions that resulted in immediate dismissal of my concerns. His statement--"There is nothing I can do to help today"--was not only medically inappropriate but also ethically negligent, as it demonstrated a refusal to explore alternative treatment options, including non-controlled interventions such as a Toradol injection or other pain management strategies. Until Concerns of the violations of duty were raised to him, & he then brought up the RICE strategy. Professional Misconduct: Defamation of Character & Escalation of False Claims Another deeply concerning issue was Joe Porter's deliberate attempt to escalate and fabricate false claims regarding my demeanor during the visit. When I rightfully challenged his lack of assessment & refusal to engage in a professional discussion regarding my care, he resorted to unfounded accusations, stating that his staff had described me as "aggressive & rude." However, upon my departure, I personally inquired with the staff, asking if I had been in any way aggressive or rude, to which all of them confirmed: "No, you were friendly & obviously in pain." He admitted to inflating the information about my behavior & also tried to apologize for fabricating this detail.This clear discrepancy exposes an intentional & fraudulent attempt by Joe Porter to discredit a patient who was simply advocating for their right to adequate medical care. This constitutes defamation of character, a serious ethical violation under Utah medical board regulations. Per Utah Code § 58-1-501 (Unprofessional Conduct), a medical provider engaging in the deliberate misrepresentation of a patient's behavior, fabricating statements, or engaging in retaliatory action against a patient who questions their care violates professional standards & is subject to disciplinary action. Moreover, creating false accusations to justify substandard care can be grounds for formal sanctions, including reprimand, fines, or suspension of licensure. Violation of Informed Patient Rights & Refusal to Engage in a Collaborative Care Model
A formal complaint will be with the Utah medical board. read more
