I realize that what constitutes "good art" from "bad art" is totally subjective, and that beauty is…read moreindeed in the eye of the beholder. I also understand how and why this particular art piece is so very controversial. After all, it DID cost nearly 5 million dollars and, in essence, it IS a fancy chandelier installed under a bridge where, often, homeless people sleep, in a city ridden with housing issues and homeless people who've fallen through the cracks of society. This art installation has received a ton of flak, deemed "tone deaf" in a world and a place rife with serious issues. All that said, I LOVED this piece, and I will tell you why:
-this piece does what "good art" should: it elicits a dialogue about contemporary and/or significant social issues. The very fact that this piece is controversial and has elicited such strong reactions, both positive and negative, tells me that it has done a great service by bringing attention to issues like the homeless, affordable housing, and public art. The worst thing any art could do would be to be ignorable and inconsequential, and have people walk by it and either not notice it or not care. Love it or hate it, you can't say that about this spinning chandelier! People have very strong, visceral opinions about it, either way. But everyone DOES have an opinion about it!
-people who take umbrage with this piece often bemoan its high cost and say this money could've been put to better use by feeding and housing the homeless. It's important to note that this art piece was commissioned and purchased by Westbank, the developer of the adjacent Vancouver House. It was not bought by the City. As such, it was privately purchased. I have art in my own home that I've bought - and some I've made myself - and I know that not all of it is liked (or even understood) by others, and I'm okay with that. No-one should criticize me for my taste in art, that I purchased myself. If I was allowed to put it in a public space for others to enjoy, perhaps most would love it and appreciate the fact that they get to enjoy contemporary art without having to pay admission price to a gallery; others may dislike the art, or resent that it is there. But they can't complain that they funded it when they did not, and it would be presumptuous for them to say I should have given my personal money to other charitable causes than fund art. After all, who's to say I don't also give to charitable causes, too? It's my money and I can do with it as I want.
-for those who say they "hate" this piece and it shouldn't be on display, I counter, hey, I might hate rap music, but I'd never argue that it should never be made or played. Who am I to tell others what music they should listen to?
This piece is really amazing. It is a huge chandelier, comprised of many dangling crystal-like pendants. They've added a third "spinning" time, so now it drops and spins three times a day: at 12 noon, 4pm and 9pm. When it drops, the chandelier lights up, and it spins for about 5 minutes before ascending back to its original position under the bridge. I visited it the other day at 4 pm and videotaped the whole performance. I can see how this would be way more dramatic at night, but the daytime performance was super cool, too. It's quite the feat in engineering, and it garnered a lot of attention from passers-by - many of whom stopped to film the show like I did. The only extra feature I can think of that would make this super-duper cool would be to have some music playing during the spinning performance. That would elevate the drama! But still, it's truly a spectacle, and I thoroughly enjoyed the whole whimsy of it!
A short hop from the seawall at Howe, and right beside the New Vancouver House and Fresh St. Market and London Drugs between Beach and Pacific. It's truly a sight to behold! Check it out!