Ive read much of Henry's propaganda that relates to my injury & while I qualify for assistance & a compensation claim under the terms layed out in his own words, he saw fit to refuse my claim without so much as an explanation & when I chose to review his performance online, his only recourse was to post a series of lies in order to coddle his overinflated sense of self.
This is not a man to be trusted, this is not a man that will fight for you or the truth as is my experience, but this is a man who conducts his backroom deals in order to feather his own nest on the backs of those who suffer, while dolling out excuse & pittance to those who for the most part are only looking to be heard.
This is not a man who fights for justice, this is not a man who stands up for a cause, but this is a man who will tell you what you want to hear for a profit while reciting it's better you get something than nothing at all.
Now I ask you if you haven't already asked yourself... is that the type of man you want standing beside you.
It is this disgraceful behaviour that continues to mar this industry & why only a select few eventually prosper, while others are left to lick their wounds.
Ang
You do deserve more, you do deserve better, you absolutely deserve a firm that acts with honour & integrity, this sadly in my experience is not this firm.
Good luck to you all.
Ang
Dear Mr Carus,
In addition to your inflammatory reply, there's much that I understand, some of which still excites me amongst the negligence that continues to haunt me, but if you feel you have an opinion that justifies your position, then go your hardest as I am perfectly happy to go toe to toe with you publicly & not behind closed doors, given that's where you conduct your dodgy deals, I at least have nothing to hide nor anything to be ashamed off.
You were not there to share my hospital room for the weeks that I was tormented & belittled for taking a stance against the type of coercion that for the most part boarded on bullyiyoung children I was coerced to believe that theng... you were not there when as a father of answer to my pain was amputation... you were not there when the subsequent staph infection that bubbled & seeped out of every wound was neglected to the point where no one would listen irrespective of what I may have thought... you were not there when the inevitable festered & continuously went undiagnosed despite my assursions.
You were not there or forced to walk laps by a physiotherapist who had no idea & well out of her depth & who took great delight whilst I was protesting my pain, I was made to walk up & down, back & forth between parallel bars where the repercussions at that time only exacerbated the injury rather than assisting in its repair... you were not there when finally my best & last option was to leave the hospital in a wheel chair & an external fixator (google it) against their advice (because in there eyes I hadn't suffered enough) for the sake of my sanity & my health & to seek medical assistance elsewhere.
You were not there when I was made to feel as though I was irrelevant or unable to assist in my own recovery... you were not there when finally I was vindicated even though it has continued to come at a cost, I was at least able to regain my focus.
Now to be clear, the last 6 weeks of my hospital stay where I was at no time tested for staph, when the probability is so outrageously high, I was left to literally stew in my own juices... this was not only neglegent in my view, but quite possibly criminal & the only one who lacks understanding in this instance is you Henry... because you were just not there.
Your judgment that my claim was not a valid one is ludicrous & was clearly based on an individual with a short attention span & not one that was sympathetic to the process of investigation, or the practice of integrity, but sure; you can stand by your impotent imagination.
Eighteen months later when I was finally cleared of the infection, it then dawned on me how long would I have suffered from the infection & medication if I had been assessed & treated earlier or if the dressings in fact had been tested before they were tossed... now I know where their propensity to argue, bully, condescend & be dismissive, but where was their duty of care.
Now I may have been better off just going straight home after the fall & pretended I twisted my ankle & recovered naturally... of course I kid, but if we are to be deemed recalcitrant & ignored for having an opinion, then the distance we share surely will continue to broaden.
Furthermore you also failed to assess that at the very least there is a claim for Workcover, but in your haste to relieve yourself of the responsibility, given your inability to answer my initial enquiry due to it being deemed "advice", I guess this also now becomes moot.
L'chiam
Ang read more
