I was calling about a business dispute, Lynn was really rude. I wanted to know if I had a case or…read morenot. I had no idea me calling him was "the free consultation". He said why didn't you do this or that, look buddy my goal was to provide evidence to see if I have a case, not for you to ask me what you would've done. Consultation is really expensive aswell for 1 hour. $680 for a small claims matter. Richard ended reaching out to me and gave me the information I was looking for. I haven't hired this firm but the consultation from him was helpful. Lynn on the other hand was garbage. I can't give it a 5 or 4 from initial interactions. This new review reflects my experience so far from this firm.

Prompt response. Quick, knowledgeable, quality advice on options to move forward. In 5 minutes gave…read moreenough advice for me to move forward with confidence. Would definitely call again!

My husband and I had the need to request assistance from the Gordon Law Firm on two occasions. One…read morewas a speeding ticket and the second was a retail consumer issue. We dealt with Mr. Gordon and Ms. Leandra Rodriguez. They both provided excellent service. They handled the issues quickly, addressed all of our questions and always returned phone calls/emails. They were also very good at listening to our issues. If we ever need an attorney again Gordon will be our first call

Attorney Stephen Gordon did a phenomenal job at taking care of my legal matter, I could not be…read morehappier with any other lawyer dealing with my case

Carlos is a very helpful kind attorney! He took time for my husband and myself to answer some…read morequestions. Then we decided to higher him for some family law help his advice blew me away he's really about the people and will go all the way for you and your family . All we wanted was to have visitation threw the year with my step daughter and Carlos is working on that for us . He gave us advice on things we didn't see where possible and showed us holes in our current court order I would highly recommend him . He truly goes above and beyond to assist his clients! Thank you Carlos for all your help

From the owner: Fight For You Every Dollar You Deserve…read more Law Office of Carlos Molinar is a trusted San Antonio, TX, law firm delivering strategic legal representation for individuals and families facing workplace, personal, criminal, and family-related legal matters. We provide experienced guidance in work injury cases, workers' compensation, criminal defense, personal injury claims, and family law designed to protect your rights and long-term interests. Our skilled team combines personalized strategies, clear communication, and dependable advocacy tailored to each client's unique circumstances. Clients choose us for trusted expertise, responsive support, compassionate service, and professional legal solutions. Contact us today for dependable legal guidance designed around your needs.

I contacted Hilly and Solis Law Firm after my parents' car accident, I would absolutely recommend…read moreCarlos Solis and his team! Thank you for being attentive with my parents. God, forbid another accident, but if I do I know who l will call first. Thank you.

Very attentive and friendly. Their team is responsive and both partners really know their stuff…read more Highly recommend to everyone I know in San Antonio.

Very knowledgeable, friendly and was able to answer all my questions. Responded in a very timely…read moremanner and felt I was getting expert assistance. Highly recommend!

I moved from Oregon to Texas 2 years ago and needed to transfer the guardianship for my autistic…read moreadult son. I contacted the Texas Bar Association for a referral and they gave me this firm's information. In the initial phone call, attorney assured me that this could be handled easily. It's been 2 years and still not fully resolved. It's cost me nearly as much money to transfer the case and probably would have been easier to just file a new guardianship in Texas. The attorney didn't know how to do a transfer between states and drafted motions that couldn't be filed since they aren't licensed in Oregon but I was still charged for the work while they were basically doing trial and error learning at my expense. I don't get any kinds of updates unless I ask for it and even then the communications lack details and clarity and I find myself having to send a series of back and forth email to get full detail. I would not recommend this firm.

I completed an online twice requesting a consultation no one called me. I the office and was told…read moresomeone would call me at 3pm, no one called. About 3:15 I called and was transferred to a man and was explaining what I needed when he cut in and said, we need to hurry this up, I have a call at 3:30 so it's a hard stop, it was 3:15. I can't imagine working with someone so abrupt and rude with a potential client.

I strongly recommend Efron & Efron. Brad was able to quickly and expertly assess my case, and then…read moreprovide practical and useful advice. Look no further, you've found the best if you're seeking real estate expertise.

Thankful he at least took the time to hear out and investigate my case but seems too scared to take…read morerisks where justice is needed in face of a public figure. I would assume based off our interactions he's probably a great lawyer for anything other than libel / defamation. I would encourage him (and all lawyers) to stop future - telling in the phone calls, he's unintentionally denied my right to even take legal action. Stating "a judge is not going to..." like how does he know??? Obviously, it's his choice to deny representation but still failed to understand that marketing is partially a numbers game and a defamed character cannot try to do business with someone already assuming the worst of them... and assumption made based off false statements published to a third party with reckless disregard for the truth. There's proof of malicious / negligent intentions. The case meets the criteria needed. His strategy is just super fixed on witness stating they would have done business with me but won't now. But since my name was exposed negatively before I got a chance to do my work, there's no telling. That's why damages can only be calculated by law of averages alone.

For approximately 258 days, I was denied the ability to speak to my children--despite zero findings…read moreof abuse against me. During that same period, the children remained in an environment where the mother was facing a pending felony for injury to a child, with active CPS involvement. A documented pattern of violence existed, including the April 27 incident, after which communication was cut off when I contacted law enforcement. These events were known and provided, yet treated as irrelevant. A Child Safe Center forensic interview, conducted at the direction of CPS and SAPD, confirmed trauma to the child. Two CPS safety plans further identified risk involving the mother, her family, and the children's environment. These safety plans were based on violence occurring against me and in front of the children. Despite this, these concerns were not prioritized--they were ignored. Medical Documentation of Assault Ignored Medical records confirm that one of the children was assaulted by bodily force. The child reported being hit on the neck and shoulder, dragged by his arms, and punched in the stomach and knee. Bruising was documented, and the mechanism was identified as assault. The provider recommended avoiding the individual responsible and contacting law enforcement or CPS if it continued. This constitutes medical documentation of abuse. Ignored Warnings and Predictable Violence Prior to a separate assault against me, warnings were communicated in advance. Messages indicated concern that I would be assaulted that day, including statements from the children themselves telling me to be careful. That assault did occur. I was assaulted while holding our child, threatened with death, and law enforcement responded. This was not unforeseen. It was warned, predictable, and preventable. Failure to Act on Known Risk Children sent direct messages stating they were scared and uncomfortable around the same individual who had previously assaulted me in front of them and threatened to kill me. Harassment occurred despite existing restrictions, including a no-contact order. At the same time, CPS had identified the environment as involving violence and ongoing risk through two safety plans. Yet the environment remained unchanged. Children's Voices and Expressions Ignored The children consistently expressed fear, discomfort, and a desire to live with their father. They also conveyed fear through drawings, including concern that their father would be harmed or killed. These expressions aligned with documented violence, confirmed trauma, and ongoing safety concerns. Yet their voices were minimized, their concerns were not prioritized, and their emotional indicators were not treated as credible. Imbalance in Treatment While these documented safety concerns were not acted upon, I was cleared by CPS multiple times with no findings of abuse. Despite this, I was restricted from my children, treated as the issue, and removed from their lives for extended periods. Forensic Findings Ignored A court-ordered forensic evaluation found that I was highly credible, a fit parent, and suffering from PTSD due to abuse by the mother. This report was available in January. It was not used to inform decisions, correct false claims, or protect the children. Instead, it was later referenced in court on June 25 as if it were new. It was not. Selective Presentation to the Court Critical safety concerns--including medical evidence of assault, Child Safe Center findings, CPS safety plans, advance warnings of violence, and the presence of a violent individual under a no-contact order--were not meaningfully presented to the court. Instead, focus was directed toward issues unrelated to the children's safety. Questions That Must Be Answered Why were two CPS safety plans not treated as controlling information? Why was medical documentation of assault not elevated as a primary concern? Why were advance warnings of violence not acted upon? Why were direct statements from the children expressing fear ignored? Why were the children's voices minimized? Why were these risks not presented to the court? Why was a parent repeatedly cleared by CPS treated as the problem? Conclusion This was not a lack of information. Violence was warned in advance. Assaults occurred. Trauma was confirmed. Two CPS safety plans identified risk. The children expressed fear. The reporting parent was cleared. Yet the response did not match the severity of the facts. The environment remained unchanged, and the same risks continued. Removing me did not fix the problem. It exposed it.

I highly recommend Mrs Hessbrook. She is an honest and reliable attorney who helped me throughout…read moremy whole case.