Cancel

    Search

    Ganzer & Williams

    4.5 (6 reviews)
    Open 8:30 am - 5:00 pm
    Updated 3 months ago

    Request a consultation

    Response time

    1 day

    Response rate

    50%

    Services - Ganzer & Williams

    Business litigation

    Ganzer & Williams Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Ganzer & Williams

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of John O.
    8
    78
    56

    4 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    13 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    13 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Ganzer & Williams

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Bankruptcy Law 239 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry & Christopherson

    Kroloff, Belcher, Smart, Perry & Christopherson

    3.0
    (4 reviews)

    This law firm is quite good at first I was hesitant but honestly their service is excellent they…read moregot us in right away. They are very explicit and concise with their service pertaining the kind of help we need. They are friendly very attentive, comfortable to talk with. Well for my husband and I, if all the qualities, their values and feeling assured then it's worth a visit. So if needing some help regarding Will & Trust it's worth the call ask questions first about their service and make an appointment..

    My family and I had an experience with this law firm during the administration of my aunt's…read moreCalifornia probate estate. The estate contained limited assets. According to probate filings, the executor received nearly $75,000 in compensation and reimbursements, and the attorneys received more than $16,000 in legal fees. Based on our understanding of the will, several beneficiaries did not receive property or distributions that they believed were contemplated, and no one received any amount as much as the executor for assets less than $325,000, some assets were never addressed at all ii the final accounting, where the family had to purchase the last legal filings themselves. One concern relates to notice and transparency during the administration of the estate. Following service of the Inventory and Appraisal in April 2025, additional filings were made with the court through November 2025. It is our understanding that only one beneficiary signed a Waiver of Notice of Proposed Action in April 2023, while other beneficiaries did not waive notice. Subsequent filings after April 2025, including the final accounting and distribution documents, were not served on all beneficiaries, including matters involving compensation. If accurate, this raises questions about whether all interested parties were provided notice and an opportunity to participate in the probate process. Another concern involves accounting and financial disclosure. A family member requested a complete accounting of the estate's assets, expenses, and distributions on multiple occasions, including through formal service upon the law office. According to our records, a full accounting was not provided in response to those requests. There were also concerns regarding communication. As the probate progressed, communication became more limited. Requests for information and clarification were not consistently addressed, and responses were not always provided in a timely manner. In one instance, a named heir who asked questions was informed by Terry Loa that she was not a party to the case. When Rebecca Sem was contacted directly, a similar response was received. Concerns were also raised regarding the handling of vulnerable individuals. Family members informed both the executor and the attorneys that the decedent's son had lifelong cognitive impairments and later experienced a stroke affecting his decision-making capacity. Based on our observations, no formal evaluation or action addressing these concerns was evident during the administration of the estate. Privacy issues were another area of concern. Despite notification that a granddaughter had a no-contact order involving her father, probate documents continued to include her address in filings and correspondence. Questions also arose regarding the distribution of estate property. The distribution of certain items, including antiques, jewelry, and a vehicle, differed from what some family members understood to be the intended allocations under the will. Those distributions did not align with the decedent's intent based on available information. When Atty Sems was asked directly what had happened to a great-great grandmother's rocker and other assets, the response was that the son was given the option and any remaining items were disposed of. Overall, based on our review of the probate record and our experience, there were concerns regarding communication, notice, accounting, and the administration of the estate. Probate attorneys and executors have responsibilities that include providing notice, maintaining transparency, and administering the estate in accordance with applicable law and the decedent's wishes. This review reflects my family's experience and our understanding of the probate record. Individuals considering this firm for estate administration may wish to review court filings, inquire about attorney fees and executor compensation, and seek clarification regarding notice requirements and accounting procedures. This law office failed in our opinion to follow legalities and allowed an exector, the law firm and her spouse (who had no family relations) to profit from a families traumatic event.

    Calone & Harrel Law Group

    Calone & Harrel Law Group

    3.7
    (3 reviews)

    Jason Harrel, Keith Wood, and Darren Pluth are top-notch attorneys--exceptionally skilled,…read moreresponsive, and steadfast advocates who deliver outstanding results for their clients.

    Legal Genius! During…read morethe last five years, I have been in a custody battle with my ex-husband. My ex was pretty much an absentee father for the first seven years of our child's life, and only came back into her life when she got Leukemia. During this time, my ex decided to get re-married to someone he met after returning to Sacramento. My child was mentally, emotionally, and physically abused by my ex and his new wife. My ex-husband left the military (approximately two years after re-entering our daughter's life), and decided to take me to court to get his child support lowered and attempt to obtain custody of our daughter. During this time, he lied and attempted to hide the fact he had a severance pay equal to his yearly salary, and was receiving unemployment at the same time. My ex spent the money on home improvements and furniture for him, his wife, and stepchild, instead of saving the money to pay his monthly child support. Because my ex-husband was in the military, and had never been in trouble with the law, owned a home, and had a new spouse at home, he looked like a great guy on paper. Meanwhile, I am a single mother who was living in an apartment at the time, working full time, and earning my degree, so my ex thought he would look like a better caregiver for our daughter. My ex hired an attorney with over 35 years of Family court experience, and with a specialty in fighting for a father's "parental rights," and I hired Mr. Culbreath. Thanks to Mr. Culbreath's legal ingenuity, my ex was not able to hide his income and assets, and was ordered to pay a higher amount of child support than he did before he left the military. Mr. Culbreath was by my side through every attempt my ex-husband tried to get out of his financial and parental obligations to my daughter. Mr. Culbreath also obtained an order banning the stepmother from interfering with my daughter's medical, educational, and religious needs, effectively making my ex take more responsibility for our daughter. Shaun also obtained a stipulation stating my-ex and his wife are not allowed to physically, mentally, or emotionally, degrade or abuse my daughter any longer. To make an already long story, short; my ex-husband went through two more experienced Family Law Attorneys', and Mr. Culbreath chewed them up and spit them out (figuratively), in court. Mr. Culbreath could combat every argument the opposition threw at him. Mr. Culbreath uses common sense, empathy, legal expertise, and digs into the details of a case before appearing in front of the Judge. Mr. Culbreath always kept me informed of the likely hood of success of any argument that I wanted to make, and took the time to educate me on the nuances of the law. There was nothing my ex-husband could bring up that Shaun hadn't already thought of a legal argument for. Mr. Culbreath is a Legal Assassin, and because of his ability to argue the detrimental flaws of my ex's parenting, I now have 100% physical custody of my daughter. I also hired Mr. Culbreath to handle my Grandmothers estate after her passing, and he made this a painless process as well. Mr. Culbreath is a great attorney whether he is presenting in court, or handling in-office cases. Shaun Culbreath is the only Attorney I trust to handle my legal needs, and recommend him to anyone who has a need of Legal help.

    Ganzer & Williams - bankruptcy - Updated August 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...