As per my first amendment right, I am writing this review as a former employee of Bright Beginners Academy who ultimately made the difficult decision to resign due to ongoing concerns regarding leadership and workplace treatment.
It has recently come to my attention that Scott has communicated with parents suggesting that Sanela was responsible for the staff walkout. That claim is entirely inaccurate. Sanela did not encourage, organize, or pressure anyone to leave. She simply informed staff that she had submitted her two-weeks' notice. Shortly afterward, she was terminated and told she was not permitted to return, with threats of police involvement if she did. The staff's decision to resign was a collective response to ongoing workplace concerns, not the result of influence from one individual.
I also observed similar patterns during Kelly's time at the center, where responsibility for workplace issues appeared to be shifted away from ownership. The same pattern now seems to be repeating.
During my employment, staff experienced sudden changes that included the removal of benefits, attempts to reduce pay, and cuts to scheduled hours. I also personally experienced unprofessional treatment, including negative comments related to not being part of the owner's church and criticism regarding my tattoos and piercings. These actions created an uncomfortable and, at times, hostile work environment.
Another serious concern occurred on the day severe wind damage impacted the building. The owner sent his accountant into the facility to question staff. This individual was not a staff member, had no known background check on file, and was not listed on any approved pick-up documentation. His presence in the building, particularly near the children's restroom area, made staff uncomfortable. In a childcare setting, safety and proper clearance procedures should always be strictly followed.
At one point, staff were offered $200 to remain until March 6th while additional hires were made, along with a proposed 10% raise for staying longer term. While retention efforts are understandable, the circumstances under which this was presented felt more like pressure than support.
Since then, a former director's assistant, Julia, has been brought back. During her previous tenure, many staff felt she communicated in a demeaning manner and frequently escalated situations unnecessarily. Morale noticeably improved after her departure, and her return has raised concerns among former staff.
Additionally, I witnessed frequent unprofessional discussions about parents, including commentary regarding tuition payments and personal financial matters. Such conversations should not take place among staff and reflect poorly on leadership standards.
Finally, I have been informed by parents that personal health matters have been referenced in communications in ways that feel unrelated to operational concerns. While everyone deserves compassion regarding personal challenges, professional boundaries are essential in a childcare environment.
I share this experience not out of bitterness, but out of concern. As a former employee who cared deeply about the children and families served, I believe transparency is important. I encourage parents and future staff members to carefully consider these concerns when making decisions regarding employment or enrollment. read more